* refactor: plumb executor into all Db instances
* refactor: Route all query executions through worker pool
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat: use a dedicated tokio threadpool for running queries
* feat: plumb number of executor threads through to command line
thread through command line
* fix: Logical merge conflict
* fix: another logical conflict
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The initial benchmarks look like this on my i9 MBP:
```
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag0/no_pred 1.00 91.0±2.55ms ? ?/sec
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag0/with_pred 1.00 11.5±0.72ms ? ?/sec
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag1/no_pred 1.00 120.3±5.10ms ? ?/sec
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag1/with_pred 1.00 11.2±0.22ms ? ?/sec
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag2/no_pred 1.00 203.2±8.45ms ? ?/sec
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag2/with_pred 1.00 11.2±0.21ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag0/no_pred 1.00 100.3±3.73ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag0/with_pred 1.00 31.2±1.80ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag1/no_pred 1.00 126.7±2.29ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag1/with_pred 1.00 33.0±1.70ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag2/no_pred 1.00 212.0±6.86ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag2/with_pred 1.00 18.1±0.99ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag0/no_pred 1.00 98.7±6.08ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag0/with_pred 1.00 11.2±0.37ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag1/no_pred 1.00 118.9±3.97ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag1/with_pred 1.00 11.7±0.64ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag2/no_pred 1.00 202.1±8.49ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag2/with_pred 1.00 11.1±0.27ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag0/no_pred 1.00 109.2±5.20ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag0/with_pred 1.00 44.2±1.83ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag1/no_pred 1.00 132.9±3.79ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag1/with_pred 1.00 41.7±2.43ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag2/no_pred 1.00 222.4±7.00ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag2/with_pred 1.00 27.9±0.92ms ? ?/sec
```
Rationale
---------
We use `u32` throughout the codebase to reference for interned dictionary strings.
We also use `u32` for other reasons and it would be nice to get some help from the compiler
to avoid mixing them up
This removes the old ReplicatedWrite structure and implements the writing of an Entry to the Db. I also call out in `server/lib.rs` and in the `Db` where sharding and replication might happen.
I've also added helpers in various places to write line protocol to chunks, tables, and databases. That enabled removing a good amount of code from the test helpers crate.
Edd Robinson
Carol (Nichols || Goulding)
Marco Neumann
Nga Tran
Andrew Lamb
Marko Mikulicic
kodiakhq[bot]
Raphael Taylor-Davies
Paul Dix