We cannot rely on the default value as a pin could
be use for Analog purposes in which this bit is cleared
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Mahadevan <mahesh.mahadevan@nxp.com>
* Updates driver library to v2.3.1 (2018q1) for bugfixes and convenience functions
* Provides library in correct format (2-byte wchar_t flag) for compiling with ARMCC (#6695 uncovered by #6577)
* Reverts to using a statically-allocated packet buffer since malloc is not thread-safe (and the asserts have been turned on)
Previously, the echo test followed a flow like the following:
-STEP- -HOST PC- -DEVICE-
0 send _sync
1 echo back _sync
2 send echo_count
3 echo back echo_count
4 send first echo packet
5 echo back echo packet
(repeat echo steps)
However, as noted by issue #6659, this test would somtimes fail between
steps 4 and 5. To ensure each KV pair makes to the correct destination,
we usually write the KV back. Step 4 does not wait for this to happen
and starts sending echo packets. So the device is acting as the "echo
server".
This change makes the host PC the "echo server". The idea being that the
device will be slower and the host pc should always be able to keep up
with it, not the other way around.
Appears when complied with -O3 optimization level
Compile: UARTSerial.cpp
../drivers/UARTSerial.cpp: In member function 'void mbed::UARTSerial::tx_irq()':
../drivers/UARTSerial.cpp:314:31: warning: 'data' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
SerialBase::_base_putc(data);
- fix compiler warning message of flash_api.c
- fix compiler warning message of startup_ADuCM4050.c
- eliminate absolute address of ROM tables
- add MBED_APP_START and MBED_APP_SIZE to linker scripts
As pointed out by davidefer, the lookahead pointer modular arithmetic
does not work around integer overflow when the pointer size is not a
multiple of the block count.
To avoid overflow problems, the easy solution is to stop trying to
work around integer overflows and keep the lookahead offset inside the
block device. To make this work, the ack was modified into a resetable
counter that is decremented every block allocation.
As a plus, quite a bit of the allocation logic ended up simplified.
One of the big simplifications in littlefs's implementation is the
complete lack of tracking free blocks, allowing operations to simply
drop blocks that are no longer in use.
However, this means the lookahead buffer can easily contain outdated
blocks that were previously deleted. This is usually fine, as littlefs
will rescan the storage if it can't find a free block in the lookahead
buffer, but after changes that caused littlefs to more conservatively
respect the alloc acks (e611cf5), any scanned blocks after an ack would
be incorrectly trusted.
The fix is to eagerly scan ahead in the lookahead when we allocate so
that alloc acks are better able to discredit old lookahead blocks. Since
usually alloc acks are tightly coupled to allocations of one or two blocks,
this allows littlefs to properly rescan every set of allocations.
This may still be a concern if there is a long series of worn out
blocks, but in the worst case littlefs will conservatively avoid using
blocks it's not sure about.
Found by davidefer
Compile: lwip_stack.c
In file included from ../features/FEATURE_LWIP/lwip-interface/lwip_stack.c:41:0:
../features/FEATURE_LWIP/lwip-interface/lwip_stack.c: In function 'mbed_lwip_bringup_2':
../features/FEATURE_LWIP/lwip-interface/ppp_lwip.h:58:44: warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value]
#define ppp_lwip_disconnect() ERR_IF
^
../features/FEATURE_LWIP/lwip-interface/lwip_stack.c:858:21: note: in expansion of macro 'ppp_lwip_disconnect'
ppp_lwip_disconnect();
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../features/FEATURE_LWIP/lwip-interface/ppp_lwip.h:58:44: warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value]
#define ppp_lwip_disconnect() ERR_IF
^
../features/FEATURE_LWIP/lwip-interface/lwip_stack.c:875:21: note: in expansion of macro 'ppp_lwip_disconnect'
ppp_lwip_disconnect();
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fix the following warnings:
[Warning] wifi_util.c@791,20: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[Warning] wifi_util.c@835,21: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tonywu@realtek.com>
Fix the following errors:
[Warning] dhcps.c@158,1: label 'Exit' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
[Warning] dhcps.c@161,13: 'dump_client_table' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tonywu@realtek.com>
Fix the following warnings:
[Warning] wifi_promisc.c@113,61: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces]
[Warning] wifi_promisc.c@297,52: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[Warning] wifi_promisc.c@403,52: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tonywu@realtek.com>
Fix the following warning:
[Warning] lwip_intf.c@134,5: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tonywu@realtek.com>
Fix the following warnings:
[Warning] tcm_heap.c@70,18: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'MemChunk * {aka struct _MemChunk *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] tcm_heap.c@70,28: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'MemChunk * {aka struct _MemChunk *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] tcm_heap.c@336,6: unused variable 'i' [-Wunused-variable]
Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tonywu@realtek.com>
Fix the following warnings:
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@62,104: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 3 has type 'uint8_t* {aka unsigned char*}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@62,104: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 4 has type 'uint8_t* {aka unsigned char*}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@62,104: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 5 has type 'uint8_t* {aka unsigned char*}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@62,104: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 6 has type 'uint8_t* {aka unsigned char*}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@62,104: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 7 has type 'uint8_t* {aka unsigned char*}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@62,104: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 8 has type 'uint8_t* {aka unsigned char*}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@201,101: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 3 has type 'char*' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@201,101: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 4 has type 'char*' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@201,101: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 5 has type 'char*' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@201,101: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 6 has type 'char*' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@201,101: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 7 has type 'char*' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] rtw_emac.cpp@201,101: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int*', but argument 8 has type 'char*' [-Wformat=]
Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tonywu@realtek.com>
Fix the following warnings:
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@326,28: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of '|' [-Wparentheses]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@451,39: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 3 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@451,43: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 4 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@451,47: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 5 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@451,51: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 6 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@451,55: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 7 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,39: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 3 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,43: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 4 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,47: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 5 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,51: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 6 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,55: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 7 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,59: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 8 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,63: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 9 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,35: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 10 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,35: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 11 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,35: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 12 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,35: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 13 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,35: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 14 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@460,35: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int *', but argument 15 has type 'u32 * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@831,16: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int *', but argument 3 has type 'rtw_security_t * {aka long unsigned int *}' [-Wformat=]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@1335,2: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Wparentheses]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@1398,13: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'rtw_mfree' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@1724,7: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
[Warning] wifi_conf.c@1770,6: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tonywu@realtek.com>
Fix the following warnings:
[Warning] osdep_service.c@58,11: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[Warning] osdep_service.c@208,61: suggest braces around empty body in an 'else' statement [-Wempty-body]
[Warning] osdep_service.c@1063,16: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of '_rtw_mfree' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tonywu@realtek.com>
Fix the following warnings:
[Warning] hal_ssi.h@28,85: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Wempty-body]
[Warning] spi_api.c@87,27: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[Warning] spi_api.c@76,14: unused variable 'MaxSsiFreq' [-Wunused-variable]
Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tonywu@realtek.com>