- default value is the same as before patch
- system_stm32l4xx.c file is copied to family level with all other ST cube files
- specific clock configuration is now in a new file: system_clock.c (target level)
- nvic_addr.h file is now in TARGET_STM level
- default value is the same as before patch
- system_stm32l1xx.c file is copied to family level with all other ST cube files
- specific clock configuration is now in a new file: system_clock.c (target level)
- default value is the same as before patch
- system_stm32l0xx.c file is copied to family level with all other ST cube files
- specific clock configuration is now in a new file: system_clock.c (target level)
- default value is the same as before patch
- system_stm32f7xx.c file is copied to family level with all other ST cube files
- specific clock configuration is now in a new file: system_clock.c (target level)
- default value is the same as before patch
- system_stm32f3xx.c file is copied to family level with all other ST cube files
- specific clock configuration is now in a new file: system_clock.c (target level)
- default value is the same as before patch
- system_stm32f2xx.c file is copied to family level with all other ST cube files
- specific clock configuration is now in a new file: system_clock.c (target level)
- default value is the same as before patch
- system_stm32f1xx.c file is copied to family level with all other ST cube files
- specific clock configuration is now in a new file: system_clock.c (target level)
- default value is the same as before patch
- system_stm32f0xx.c file is copied to family level with all other ST cube files
- specific clock configuration is now in a new file: system_clock.c (target level)
In case we've run through the entire GPIOs loop, withouth finding a
matching interrupt, we're in the case of a spurious interrupt, let's
raise an error to track it down.
When disabling GPIO irq, also the falling / rising edge settings need
to be reset (EXTI_RTSR and EXTI_FTSR registers).
If not reset, the same EXTI line can be later enabled again with a wrong
Rising / Falling configuration. This was especially seen and reported in
ci-test tests-api-interruptin on NUCLEO_F446RE target where DIO2=PA_10 and
DIO6=PB_10 were successively tested: as they are sharing the same EXTI_LINE
(EXTI_10), this resulted in calling the irq_handler with wrong
IRQ_FALL/IRQ_RAISE parameter and donothing being called in loop.