Merge pull request #43932 from charles-chenzz/blog_post
Add blog post to reflect state of PodReadyToStartContainersConditionpull/44337/head
commit
efe87b401e
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
layout: blog
|
||||
title: "Kubernetes 1.29: PodReadyToStartContainers Condition Moves to Beta"
|
||||
date: 2023-12-19
|
||||
slug: pod-ready-to-start-containers-condition-now-in-beta
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Authors**: Zefeng Chen (independent), Kevin Hannon (Red Hat)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
With the recent release of Kubernetes 1.29, the `PodReadyToStartContainers`
|
||||
[condition](/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/pod-lifecycle/#pod-conditions) is
|
||||
available by default.
|
||||
The kubelet manages the value for that condition throughout a Pod's lifecycle,
|
||||
in the status field of a Pod. The kubelet will use the `PodReadyToStartContainers`
|
||||
condition to accurately surface the initialization state of a Pod,
|
||||
from the perspective of Pod sandbox creation and network configuration by a container runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
## What's the motivation for this feature?
|
||||
|
||||
Cluster administrators did not have a clear and easily accessible way to view the completion of Pod's sandbox creation
|
||||
and initialization. As of 1.28, the `Initialized` condition in Pods tracks the execution of init containers.
|
||||
However, it has limitations in accurately reflecting the completion of sandbox creation and readiness to start containers for all Pods in a cluster.
|
||||
This distinction is particularly important in multi-tenant clusters where tenants own the Pod specifications, including the set of init containers,
|
||||
while cluster administrators manage storage plugins, networking plugins, and container runtime handlers.
|
||||
Therefore, there is a need for an improved mechanism to provide cluster administrators with a clear and
|
||||
comprehensive view of Pod sandbox creation completion and container readiness.
|
||||
|
||||
## What's the benefit?
|
||||
|
||||
1. Improved Visibility: Cluster administrators gain a clearer and more comprehensive view of Pod sandbox
|
||||
creation completion and container readiness.
|
||||
This enhanced visibility allows them to make better-informed decisions and troubleshoot issues more effectively.
|
||||
2. Metric Collection and Monitoring: Monitoring services can leverage the fields associated with
|
||||
the `PodReadyToStartContainers` condition to report sandbox creation state and latency.
|
||||
Metrics can be collected at per-Pod cardinality or aggregated based on various
|
||||
properties of the Pod, such as `volumes`, `runtimeClassName`, custom annotations for CNI
|
||||
and IPAM plugins or arbitrary labels and annotations, and `storageClassName` of
|
||||
PersistentVolumeClaims.
|
||||
This enables comprehensive monitoring and analysis of Pod readiness across the cluster.
|
||||
3. Enhanced Troubleshooting: With a more accurate representation of Pod sandbox creation and container readiness,
|
||||
cluster administrators can quickly identify and address any issues that may arise during the initialization process.
|
||||
This leads to improved troubleshooting capabilities and reduced downtime.
|
||||
|
||||
### What’s next?
|
||||
|
||||
Due to feedback and adoption, the Kubernetes team promoted `PodReadyToStartContainersCondition` to Beta in 1.29.
|
||||
Your comments will help determine if this condition continues forward to get promoted to GA,
|
||||
so please submit additional feedback on this feature!
|
||||
|
||||
### How can I learn more?
|
||||
|
||||
Please check out the
|
||||
[documentation](/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/pod-lifecycle/) for the
|
||||
`PodReadyToStartContainersCondition` to learn more about it and how it fits in relation to
|
||||
other Pod conditions.
|
||||
|
||||
### How to get involved?
|
||||
|
||||
This feature is driven by the SIG Node community. Please join us to connect with
|
||||
the community and share your ideas and feedback around the above feature and
|
||||
beyond. We look forward to hearing from you!
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue