[zh] Add a blog: 2024-08-16-matchlabelkeys-podaffinity.md
parent
0aeb9c50a1
commit
e749d3637e
|
@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
layout: blog
|
||||||
|
title: 'Kubernetes 1.31:podAffinity 中的 matchLabelKeys 进阶至 Beta'
|
||||||
|
date: 2024-08-16
|
||||||
|
slug: matchlabelkeys-podaffinity
|
||||||
|
author: >
|
||||||
|
Kensei Nakada (Tetrate)
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
layout: blog
|
||||||
|
title: 'Kubernetes 1.31: MatchLabelKeys in PodAffinity graduates to beta'
|
||||||
|
date: 2024-08-16
|
||||||
|
slug: matchlabelkeys-podaffinity
|
||||||
|
author: >
|
||||||
|
Kensei Nakada (Tetrate)
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
Kubernetes 1.29 introduced new fields `MatchLabelKeys` and `MismatchLabelKeys` in PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In Kubernetes 1.31, this feature moves to beta and the corresponding feature gate (`MatchLabelKeysInPodAffinity`) gets enabled by default.
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
Kubernetes 1.29 在 podAffinity 和 podAntiAffinity 中引入了新的字段 `matchLabelKeys` 和 `mismatchLabelKeys`。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
在 Kubernetes 1.31 中,此特性进阶至 Beta,并且相应的特性门控(`MatchLabelKeysInPodAffinity`)默认启用。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
## `MatchLabelKeys` - Enhanced scheduling for versatile rolling updates
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
During a workload's (e.g., Deployment) rolling update, a cluster may have Pods from multiple versions at the same time.
|
||||||
|
However, the scheduler cannot distinguish between old and new versions based on the `LabelSelector` specified in PodAffinity or PodAntiAffinity. As a result, it will co-locate or disperse Pods regardless of their versions.
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
## `matchLabelKeys` - 为多样化滚动更新增强了调度
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
在工作负载(例如 Deployment)的滚动更新期间,集群中可能同时存在多个版本的 Pod。
|
||||||
|
然而,调度器无法基于 podAffinity 或 podAntiAffinity 中指定的 `labelSelector` 区分新旧版本。
|
||||||
|
结果,调度器将并置或分散调度 Pod,不会考虑这些 Pod 的版本。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
This can lead to sub-optimal scheduling outcome, for example:
|
||||||
|
- New version Pods are co-located with old version Pods (PodAffinity), which will eventually be removed after rolling updates.
|
||||||
|
- Old version Pods are distributed across all available topologies, preventing new version Pods from finding nodes due to PodAntiAffinity.
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
这可能导致次优的调度结果,例如:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- 新版本的 Pod 与旧版本的 Pod(podAffinity)并置在一起,这些旧版本的 Pod 最终将在滚动更新后被移除。
|
||||||
|
- 旧版本的 Pod 被分布在所有可用的拓扑中,导致新版本的 Pod 由于 podAntiAffinity 无法找到节点。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
`MatchLabelKeys` is a set of Pod label keys and addresses this problem.
|
||||||
|
The scheduler looks up the values of these keys from the new Pod's labels and combines them with `LabelSelector`
|
||||||
|
so that PodAffinity matches Pods that have the same key-value in labels.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
By using label [pod-template-hash](/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/deployment/#pod-template-hash-label) in `MatchLabelKeys`,
|
||||||
|
you can ensure that only Pods of the same version are evaluated for PodAffinity or PodAntiAffinity.
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
`matchLabelKeys` 是一组 Pod 标签键,可以解决上述问题。
|
||||||
|
调度器从新 Pod 的标签中查找这些键的值,并将其与 `labelSelector` 结合,
|
||||||
|
以便 podAffinity 匹配到具有相同标签键值的 Pod。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
通过在 `matchLabelKeys` 中使用标签
|
||||||
|
[pod-template-hash](/zh-cn/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/deployment/#pod-template-hash-label),
|
||||||
|
你可以确保对 podAffinity 或 podAntiAffinity 进行评估时仅考虑相同版本的 Pod。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
apiVersion: apps/v1
|
||||||
|
kind: Deployment
|
||||||
|
metadata:
|
||||||
|
name: application-server
|
||||||
|
...
|
||||||
|
affinity:
|
||||||
|
podAffinity:
|
||||||
|
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
|
||||||
|
- labelSelector:
|
||||||
|
matchExpressions:
|
||||||
|
- key: app
|
||||||
|
operator: In
|
||||||
|
values:
|
||||||
|
- database
|
||||||
|
topologyKey: topology.kubernetes.io/zone
|
||||||
|
matchLabelKeys:
|
||||||
|
- pod-template-hash
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
The above matchLabelKeys will be translated in Pods like:
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
上述 Pod 中的 `matchLabelKeys` 将被转换为:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
# Added from matchLabelKeys; Only Pods from the same replicaset will match this affinity.
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
kind: Pod
|
||||||
|
metadata:
|
||||||
|
name: application-server
|
||||||
|
labels:
|
||||||
|
pod-template-hash: xyz
|
||||||
|
...
|
||||||
|
affinity:
|
||||||
|
podAffinity:
|
||||||
|
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
|
||||||
|
- labelSelector:
|
||||||
|
matchExpressions:
|
||||||
|
- key: app
|
||||||
|
operator: In
|
||||||
|
values:
|
||||||
|
- database
|
||||||
|
- key: pod-template-hash # 从 matchLabelKeys 添加; 只有来自同一 ReplicaSet 的 Pod 将与此亲和性匹配
|
||||||
|
operator: In
|
||||||
|
values:
|
||||||
|
- xyz
|
||||||
|
topologyKey: topology.kubernetes.io/zone
|
||||||
|
matchLabelKeys:
|
||||||
|
- pod-template-hash
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
## `MismatchLabelKeys` - Service isolation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`MismatchLabelKeys` is a set of Pod label keys, like `MatchLabelKeys`,
|
||||||
|
which looks up the values of these keys from the new Pod's labels, and merge them with `LabelSelector` as `key notin (value)`
|
||||||
|
so that PodAffinity does _not_ match Pods that have the same key-value in labels.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Suppose all Pods for each tenant get `tenant` label via a controller or a manifest management tool like Helm.
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
## `mismatchLabelKeys` - 服务隔离
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`mismatchLabelKeys` 是一组 Pod 标签键,类似于 `matchLabelKeys`,
|
||||||
|
它在新 Pod 的标签中查找这些键的值,并将其与 `labelSelector` 合并为 `key notin (value)`,
|
||||||
|
以便 podAffinity **不**会匹配到具有相同标签键值的 Pod。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
假设每个租户的所有 Pod 通过控制器或像 Helm 这样的清单管理工具得到 `tenant` 标签。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
Although the value of `tenant` label is unknown when composing each workload's manifest,
|
||||||
|
the cluster admin wants to achieve exclusive 1:1 tenant to domain placement for a tenant isolation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`MismatchLabelKeys` works for this usecase;
|
||||||
|
By applying the following affinity globally using a mutating webhook,
|
||||||
|
the cluster admin can ensure that the Pods from the same tenant will land on the same domain exclusively,
|
||||||
|
meaning Pods from other tenants won't land on the same domain.
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
尽管在组合每个工作负载的清单时,`tenant` 标签的值是未知的,
|
||||||
|
但集群管理员希望实现租户与域之间形成排他性的 1:1 对应关系,以便隔离租户。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`mismatchLabelKeys` 适用于这一使用场景;
|
||||||
|
通过使用变更性质的 Webhook 在全局应用以下亲和性,
|
||||||
|
集群管理员可以确保来自同一租户的 Pod 将以独占方式落到同一域上,
|
||||||
|
这意味着来自其他租户的 Pod 不会落到同一域上。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
# ensures the pods of this tenant land on the same node pool
|
||||||
|
# ensures only Pods from this tenant lands on the same node pool
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
affinity:
|
||||||
|
podAffinity: # 确保此租户的 Pod 落在同一节点池上
|
||||||
|
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
|
||||||
|
- matchLabelKeys:
|
||||||
|
- tenant
|
||||||
|
topologyKey: node-pool
|
||||||
|
podAntiAffinity: # 确保只有此租户的 Pod 落在同一节点池上
|
||||||
|
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
|
||||||
|
- mismatchLabelKeys:
|
||||||
|
- tenant
|
||||||
|
labelSelector:
|
||||||
|
matchExpressions:
|
||||||
|
- key: tenant
|
||||||
|
operator: Exists
|
||||||
|
topologyKey: node-pool
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
The above matchLabelKeys and mismatchLabelKeys will be translated to like:
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
上述的 `matchLabelKeys` 和 `mismatchLabelKeys` 将被转换为:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
# ensures the pods of this tenant land on the same node pool
|
||||||
|
# ensures only Pods from this tenant lands on the same node pool
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
kind: Pod
|
||||||
|
metadata:
|
||||||
|
name: application-server
|
||||||
|
labels:
|
||||||
|
tenant: service-a
|
||||||
|
spec:
|
||||||
|
affinity:
|
||||||
|
podAffinity: # 确保此租户的 Pod 落在同一节点池上
|
||||||
|
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
|
||||||
|
- matchLabelKeys:
|
||||||
|
- tenant
|
||||||
|
topologyKey: node-pool
|
||||||
|
labelSelector:
|
||||||
|
matchExpressions:
|
||||||
|
- key: tenant
|
||||||
|
operator: In
|
||||||
|
values:
|
||||||
|
- service-a
|
||||||
|
podAntiAffinity: # 确保只有此租户的 Pod 落在同一节点池上
|
||||||
|
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
|
||||||
|
- mismatchLabelKeys:
|
||||||
|
- tenant
|
||||||
|
labelSelector:
|
||||||
|
matchExpressions:
|
||||||
|
- key: tenant
|
||||||
|
operator: Exists
|
||||||
|
- key: tenant
|
||||||
|
operator: NotIn
|
||||||
|
values:
|
||||||
|
- service-a
|
||||||
|
topologyKey: node-pool
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
## Getting involved
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
These features are managed by Kubernetes [SIG Scheduling](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/sig-scheduling).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Please join us and share your feedback. We look forward to hearing from you!
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
## 参与其中
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
这些特性由 Kubernetes
|
||||||
|
[SIG Scheduling](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/sig-scheduling) 管理。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
请加入我们并分享你的反馈。我们期待听到你的声音!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
## How can I learn more?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [The official document of PodAffinity](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/assign-pod-node/#inter-pod-affinity-and-anti-affinity)
|
||||||
|
- [KEP-3633: Introduce MatchLabelKeys and MismatchLabelKeys to PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-scheduling/3633-matchlabelkeys-to-podaffinity/README.md#story-2)
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
## 了解更多
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [podAffinity 的官方文档](/zh-cn/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/assign-pod-node/#inter-pod-affinity-and-anti-affinity)
|
||||||
|
- [KEP-3633:将 matchLabelKeys 和 mismatchLabelKeys 引入 podAffinity 和 podAntiAffinity](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-scheduling/3633-matchlabelkeys-to-podaffinity/README.md#story-2)
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue