Merge pull request #27185 from atoato88/fix-errors-of-linkchecker-part2

Fix errors by linkchecker.py

content/en/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/replicaset.md

@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ The `.spec.template` is a [pod template](/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/#pod-temp
 required to have labels in place. In our `frontend.yaml` example we had one label: `tier: frontend`.
 Be careful not to overlap with the selectors of other controllers, lest they try to adopt this Pod.
 
-For the template's [restart policy](/docs/concepts/workloads/Pods/pod-lifecycle/#restart-policy) field,
+For the template's [restart policy](/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/pod-lifecycle/#restart-policy) field,
 `.spec.template.spec.restartPolicy`, the only allowed value is `Always`, which is the default.
 
 ### Pod Selector

content/en/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-guide.md

@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ The **certificates.k8s.io/v1beta1** API version of CertificateSigningRequest wil
 * All existing persisted objects are accessible via the new API
 * Notable changes in `certificates.k8s.io/v1`:
     * For API clients requesting certificates:
-        * `spec.signerName` is now required (see [known Kubernetes signers](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/certificate-signing-requests/#kubernetes-signers)), and requests for `kubernetes.io/legacy-unknown` are not allowed to be created via the `certificates.k8s.io/v1` API
+        * `spec.signerName` is now required (see [known Kubernetes signers](/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/certificate-signing-requests/#kubernetes-signers)), and requests for `kubernetes.io/legacy-unknown` are not allowed to be created via the `certificates.k8s.io/v1` API
         * `spec.usages` is now required, may not contain duplicate values, and must only contain known usages
     * For API clients approving or signing certificates:
         * `status.conditions` may not contain duplicate types