Fix scaling terminology
Replace scale `up/down` terminology with `out/in` as the point is about adding more nodes to the cluster. - https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/solutions/scaling-out-vs-scaling-up/ - https://www.dell.com/en-us/blog/the-difference-between-scale-up-and-scale-out/pull/36400/head
parent
e46f6685f2
commit
bf998026d2
|
|
@ -314,11 +314,11 @@ ETCDCTL_API=3 etcdctl --endpoints=https://127.0.0.1:2379 \
|
|||
```
|
||||
where `trusted-ca-file`, `cert-file` and `key-file` can be obtained from the description of the etcd Pod.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scaling up etcd clusters
|
||||
## Scaling out etcd clusters
|
||||
|
||||
Scaling up etcd clusters increases availability by trading off performance.
|
||||
Scaling out etcd clusters increases availability by trading off performance.
|
||||
Scaling does not increase cluster performance nor capability. A general rule
|
||||
is not to scale up or down etcd clusters. Do not configure any auto scaling
|
||||
is not to scale out or in etcd clusters. Do not configure any auto scaling
|
||||
groups for etcd clusters. It is highly recommended to always run a static
|
||||
five-member etcd cluster for production Kubernetes clusters at any officially
|
||||
supported scale.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue