Merge pull request #37766 from pohly/dynamic-resource-allocation-concepts
dynamic resource allocation conceptspull/38135/head
commit
be09333a58
|
@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ of terminating one or more Pods on Nodes.
|
|||
* [Pod Topology Spread Constraints](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/topology-spread-constraints/)
|
||||
* [Taints and Tolerations](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/taint-and-toleration/)
|
||||
* [Scheduling Framework](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/scheduling-framework)
|
||||
* [Dynamic Resource Allocation](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/dynamic-resource-allocation)
|
||||
* [Scheduler Performance Tuning](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/scheduler-perf-tuning/)
|
||||
* [Resource Bin Packing for Extended Resources](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/resource-bin-packing/)
|
||||
* [Pod Scheduling Readiness](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/pod-scheduling-readiness/)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
- klueska
|
||||
- pohly
|
||||
title: Dynamic Resource Allocation
|
||||
content_type: concept
|
||||
weight: 65
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- overview -->
|
||||
|
||||
{{< feature-state for_k8s_version="v1.26" state="alpha" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
Dynamic resource allocation is a new API for requesting and sharing resources
|
||||
between pods and containers inside a pod. It is a generalization of the
|
||||
persistent volumes API for generic resources. Third-party resource drivers are
|
||||
responsible for tracking and allocating resources. Different kinds of
|
||||
resources support arbitrary parameters for defining requirements and
|
||||
initialization.
|
||||
|
||||
## {{% heading "prerequisites" %}}
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes v{{< skew currentVersion >}} includes cluster-level API support for
|
||||
dynamic resource allocation, but it [needs to be
|
||||
enabled](#enabling-dynamic-resource-allocation) explicitly. You also must
|
||||
install a resource driver for specific resources that are meant to be managed
|
||||
using this API. If you are not running Kubernetes v{{< skew currentVersion>}},
|
||||
check the documentation for that version of Kubernetes.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- body -->
|
||||
|
||||
## API
|
||||
|
||||
The new `resource.k8s.io/v1alpha1` {{< glossary_tooltip text="API group"
|
||||
term_id="api-group" >}} provides four new types:
|
||||
|
||||
ResourceClass
|
||||
: Defines which resource driver handles a certain kind of
|
||||
resource and provides common parameters for it. ResourceClasses
|
||||
are created by a cluster administrator when installing a resource
|
||||
driver.
|
||||
|
||||
ResourceClaim
|
||||
: Defines a particular resource instances that is required by a
|
||||
workload. Created by a user (lifecycle managed manually, can be shared
|
||||
between different Pods) or for individual Pods by the control plane based on
|
||||
a ResourceClaimTemplate (automatic lifecycle, typically used by just one
|
||||
Pod).
|
||||
|
||||
ResourceClaimTemplate
|
||||
: Defines the spec and some meta data for creating
|
||||
ResourceClaims. Created by a user when deploying a workload.
|
||||
|
||||
PodScheduling
|
||||
: Used internally by the control plane and resource drivers
|
||||
to coordinate pod scheduling when ResourceClaims need to be allocated
|
||||
for a Pod.
|
||||
|
||||
Parameters for ResourceClass and ResourceClaim are stored in separate objects,
|
||||
typically using the type defined by a {{< glossary_tooltip
|
||||
term_id="CustomResourceDefinition" text="CRD" >}} that was created when
|
||||
installing a resource driver.
|
||||
|
||||
The `core/v1` `PodSpec` defines ResourceClaims that are needed for a Pod in a new
|
||||
`resourceClaims` field. Entries in that list reference either a ResourceClaim
|
||||
or a ResourceClaimTemplate. When referencing a ResourceClaim, all Pods using
|
||||
this PodSpec (for example, inside a Deployment or StatefulSet) share the same
|
||||
ResourceClaim instance. When referencing a ResourceClaimTemplate, each Pod gets
|
||||
its own instance.
|
||||
|
||||
The `resources.claims` list for container resources defines whether a container gets
|
||||
access to these resource instances, which makes it possible to share resources
|
||||
between one or more containers.
|
||||
|
||||
Here is an example for a fictional resource driver. Two ResourceClaim objects
|
||||
will get created for this Pod and each container gets access to one of them.
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
apiVersion: resource.k8s.io/v1alpha1
|
||||
kind: ResourceClass
|
||||
name: resource.example.com
|
||||
driverName: resource-driver.example.com
|
||||
---
|
||||
apiVersion: cats.resource.example.com/v1
|
||||
kind: ClaimParameters
|
||||
name: large-black-cat-claim-parameters
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
color: black
|
||||
size: large
|
||||
---
|
||||
apiVersion: resource.k8s.io/v1alpha1
|
||||
kind: ResourceClaimTemplate
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: large-black-cat-claim-template
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
resourceClassName: resource.example.com
|
||||
parametersRef:
|
||||
apiGroup: cats.resource.example.com
|
||||
kind: ClaimParameters
|
||||
name: large-black-cat-claim-parameters
|
||||
–--
|
||||
apiVersion: v1
|
||||
kind: Pod
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: pod-with-cats
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
containers:
|
||||
- name: container0
|
||||
image: ubuntu:20.04
|
||||
command: ["sleep", "9999"]
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
claims:
|
||||
- name: cat-0
|
||||
- name: container1
|
||||
image: ubuntu:20.04
|
||||
command: ["sleep", "9999"]
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
claims:
|
||||
- name: cat-1
|
||||
resourceClaims:
|
||||
- name: cat-0
|
||||
source:
|
||||
resourceClaimTemplateName: large-black-cat-claim-template
|
||||
- name: cat-1
|
||||
source:
|
||||
resourceClaimTemplateName: large-black-cat-claim-template
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Scheduling
|
||||
|
||||
In contrast to native resources (CPU, RAM) and extended resources (managed by a
|
||||
device plugin, advertised by kubelet), the scheduler has no knowledge of what
|
||||
dynamic resources are available in a cluster or how they could be split up to
|
||||
satisfy the requirements of a specific ResourceClaim. Resource drivers are
|
||||
responsible for that. They mark ResourceClaims as "allocated" once resources
|
||||
for it are reserved. This also then tells the scheduler where in the cluster a
|
||||
ResourceClaim is available.
|
||||
|
||||
ResourceClaims can get allocated as soon as they are created ("immediate
|
||||
allocation"), without considering which Pods will use them. The default is to
|
||||
delay allocation until a Pod gets scheduled which needs the ResourceClaim
|
||||
(i.e. "wait for first consumer").
|
||||
|
||||
In that mode, the scheduler checks all ResourceClaims needed by a Pod and
|
||||
creates a PodScheduling object where it informs the resource drivers
|
||||
responsible for those ResourceClaims about nodes that the scheduler considers
|
||||
suitable for the Pod. The resource drivers respond by excluding nodes that
|
||||
don't have enough of the driver's resources left. Once the scheduler has that
|
||||
information, it selects one node and stores that choice in the PodScheduling
|
||||
object. The resource drivers then allocate their ResourceClaims so that the
|
||||
resources will be available on that node. Once that is complete, the Pod
|
||||
gets scheduled.
|
||||
|
||||
As part of this process, ResourceClaims also get reserved for the
|
||||
Pod. Currently ResourceClaims can either be used exclusively by a single Pod or
|
||||
an unlimited number of Pods.
|
||||
|
||||
One key feature is that Pods do not get scheduled to a node unless all of
|
||||
their resources are allocated and reserved. This avoids the scenario where a Pod
|
||||
gets scheduled onto one node and then cannot run there, which is bad because
|
||||
such a pending Pod also blocks all other resources like RAM or CPU that were
|
||||
set aside for it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Limitations
|
||||
|
||||
The scheduler plugin must be involved in scheduling Pods which use
|
||||
ResourceClaims. Bypassing the scheduler by setting the `nodeName` field leads
|
||||
to Pods that the kubelet refuses to start because the ResourceClaims are not
|
||||
reserved or not even allocated. It may be possible to [remove this
|
||||
limitation](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/114005) in the
|
||||
future.
|
||||
|
||||
## Enabling dynamic resource allocation
|
||||
|
||||
Dynamic resource allocation is an *alpha feature* and only enabled when the
|
||||
`DynamicResourceAllocation` [feature
|
||||
gate](/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/feature-gates/) and the
|
||||
`resource.k8s.io/v1alpha1` {{< glossary_tooltip text="API group"
|
||||
term_id="api-group" >}} are enabled. For details on that, see the
|
||||
`--feature-gates` and `--runtime-config` [kube-apiserver
|
||||
parameters](/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/kube-apiserver/).
|
||||
kube-scheduler, kube-controller-manager and kubelet also need the feature gate.
|
||||
|
||||
A quick check whether a Kubernetes cluster supports the feature is to list
|
||||
ResourceClass objects with:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
kubectl get resourceclasses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If your cluster supports dynamic resource allocation, the response is either a
|
||||
list of ResourceClass objects or:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
No resources found
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If not supported, this error is printed instead:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
error: the server doesn't have a resource type "resourceclasses"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The default configuration of kube-scheduler enables the "DynamicResources"
|
||||
plugin if and only if the feature gate is enabled. Custom configurations may
|
||||
have to be modified to include it.
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to enabling the feature in the cluster, a resource driver also has to
|
||||
be installed. Please refer to the driver's documentation for details.
|
||||
|
||||
## {{% heading "whatsnext" %}}
|
||||
|
||||
- For more information on the design, see the
|
||||
[Dynamic Resource Allocation KEP](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-node/3063-dynamic-resource-allocation/README.md).
|
|
@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ For a reference to old feature gates that are removed, please refer to
|
|||
| `DownwardAPIHugePages` | `false` | Alpha | 1.20 | 1.20 |
|
||||
| `DownwardAPIHugePages` | `false` | Beta | 1.21 | 1.21 |
|
||||
| `DownwardAPIHugePages` | `true` | Beta | 1.22 | |
|
||||
| `DynamicResourceAllocation` | `false` | Alpha | 1.26 | |
|
||||
| `EndpointSliceTerminatingCondition` | `false` | Alpha | 1.20 | 1.21 |
|
||||
| `EndpointSliceTerminatingCondition` | `true` | Beta | 1.22 | |
|
||||
| `ExpandedDNSConfig` | `false` | Alpha | 1.22 | |
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue