Merge pull request #41378 from windsonsea/awarer
[zh] sync topology-aware-routing.mdpull/41425/head
commit
a6d4eeb4d8
|
@ -0,0 +1,351 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
- robscott
|
||||
title: 拓扑感知路由
|
||||
content_type: concept
|
||||
weight: 100
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
**拓扑感知路由**提供了一种机制帮助保持网络流量处于流量发起的区域内。
|
||||
在集群中 Pod 之间优先使用相同区域的流量有助于提高可靠性、性能(网络延迟和吞吐量)或降低成本。
|
||||
---
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
- robscott
|
||||
title: Topology Aware Routing
|
||||
content_type: concept
|
||||
weight: 100
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
_Topology Aware Routing_ provides a mechanism to help keep network traffic within the zone
|
||||
where it originated. Preferring same-zone traffic between Pods in your cluster can help
|
||||
with reliability, performance (network latency and throughput), or cost.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- overview -->
|
||||
|
||||
{{< feature-state for_k8s_version="v1.23" state="beta" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{< note >}}
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Prior to Kubernetes 1.27, this feature was known as _Topology Aware Hints_.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
在 Kubernetes 1.27 之前,此特性称为**拓扑感知提示(Topology Aware Hint)**。
|
||||
{{</ note >}}
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
_Topology Aware Routing_ adjusts routing behavior to prefer keeping traffic in
|
||||
the zone it originated from. In some cases this can help reduce costs or improve
|
||||
network performance.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
**拓扑感知路由(Toplogy Aware Routing)** 调整路由行为,以优先保持流量在其发起区域内。
|
||||
在某些情况下,这有助于降低成本或提高网络性能。
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- body -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## Motivation
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes clusters are increasingly deployed in multi-zone environments.
|
||||
_Topology Aware Routing_ provides a mechanism to help keep traffic within the
|
||||
zone it originated from. When calculating the endpoints for a {{<
|
||||
glossary_tooltip term_id="Service" >}}, the EndpointSlice controller considers
|
||||
the topology (region and zone) of each endpoint and populates the hints field to
|
||||
allocate it to a zone. Cluster components such as {{< glossary_tooltip
|
||||
term_id="kube-proxy" text="kube-proxy" >}} can then consume those hints, and use
|
||||
them to influence how the traffic is routed (favoring topologically closer
|
||||
endpoints).
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 动机 {#motivation}
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes 集群越来越多地部署在多区域环境中。
|
||||
**拓扑感知路由** 提供了一种机制帮助流量保留在其发起所在的区域内。
|
||||
计算 {{<glossary_tooltip term_id="Service">}} 的端点时,
|
||||
EndpointSlice 控制器考虑每个端点的物理拓扑(地区和区域),并填充提示字段以将其分配到区域。
|
||||
诸如 {{<glossary_tooltip term_id="kube-proxy" text="kube-proxy">}}
|
||||
等集群组件可以使用这些提示,影响流量的路由方式(优先考虑物理拓扑上更近的端点)。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## Enabling Topology Aware Routing
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 启用拓扑感知路由 {#enabling-topology-aware-routing}
|
||||
|
||||
{{< note >}}
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Prior to Kubernetes 1.27, this behavior was controlled using the
|
||||
`service.kubernetes.io/topology-aware-hints` annotation.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
在 Kubernetes 1.27 之前,此行为是通过 `service.kubernetes.io/topology-aware-hints` 注解来控制的。
|
||||
{{</ note >}}
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
You can enable Topology Aware Routing for a Service by setting the
|
||||
`service.kubernetes.io/topology-mode` annotation to `Auto`. When there are
|
||||
enough endpoints available in each zone, Topology Hints will be populated on
|
||||
EndpointSlices to allocate individual endpoints to specific zones, resulting in
|
||||
traffic being routed closer to where it originated from.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
你可以通过将 `service.kubernetes.io/topology-mode` 注解设置为 `Auto` 来启用 Service 的拓扑感知路由。
|
||||
当每个区域中有足够的端点可用时,系统将为 EndpointSlices 填充拓扑提示,把每个端点分配给特定区域,
|
||||
从而使流量被路由到更接近其来源的位置。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## When it works best
|
||||
|
||||
This feature works best when:
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 何时效果最佳 {#when-it-works-best}
|
||||
|
||||
此特性在以下场景中的工作效果最佳:
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
### 1. Incoming traffic is evenly distributed
|
||||
|
||||
If a large proportion of traffic is originating from a single zone, that traffic
|
||||
could overload the subset of endpoints that have been allocated to that zone.
|
||||
This feature is not recommended when incoming traffic is expected to originate
|
||||
from a single zone.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
### 1. 入站流量均匀分布 {#incoming-traffic-is-evently-distributed}
|
||||
|
||||
如果大部分流量源自同一个区域,则该流量可能会使分配到该区域的端点子集过载。
|
||||
当预计入站流量源自同一区域时,不建议使用此特性。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
### 2. The Service has 3 or more endpoints per zone {#three-or-more-endpoints-per-zone}
|
||||
|
||||
In a three zone cluster, this means 9 or more endpoints. If there are fewer than
|
||||
3 endpoints per zone, there is a high (≈50%) probability that the EndpointSlice
|
||||
controller will not be able to allocate endpoints evenly and instead will fall
|
||||
back to the default cluster-wide routing approach.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
### 2. 服务在每个区域具有至少 3 个端点 {#three-or-more-endpoints-per-zone}
|
||||
|
||||
在一个三区域的集群中,这意味着有至少 9 个端点。如果每个区域的端点少于 3 个,
|
||||
则 EndpointSlice 控制器很大概率(约 50%)无法平均分配端点,而是回退到默认的集群范围的路由方法。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
The "Auto" heuristic attempts to proportionally allocate a number of endpoints
|
||||
to each zone. Note that this heuristic works best for Services that have a
|
||||
significant number of endpoints.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 工作原理 {#how-it-works}
|
||||
|
||||
“自动”启发式算法会尝试按比例分配一定数量的端点到每个区域。
|
||||
请注意,这种启发方式对具有大量端点的 Service 效果最佳。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
### EndpointSlice controller {#implementation-control-plane}
|
||||
|
||||
The EndpointSlice controller is responsible for setting hints on EndpointSlices
|
||||
when this heuristic is enabled. The controller allocates a proportional amount of
|
||||
endpoints to each zone. This proportion is based on the
|
||||
[allocatable](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/reserve-compute-resources/#node-allocatable)
|
||||
CPU cores for nodes running in that zone. For example, if one zone had 2 CPU
|
||||
cores and another zone only had 1 CPU core, the controller would allocate twice
|
||||
as many endpoints to the zone with 2 CPU cores.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
### EndpointSlice 控制器 {#implementation-control-plane}
|
||||
|
||||
当启用此启发方式时,EndpointSlice 控制器负责在各个 EndpointSlice 上设置提示信息。
|
||||
控制器按比例给每个区域分配一定比例数量的端点。
|
||||
这个比例基于在该区域中运行的节点的[可分配](/zh-cn/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/reserve-compute-resources/#node-allocatable)
|
||||
CPU 核心数。例如,如果一个区域有 2 个 CPU 核心,而另一个区域只有 1 个 CPU 核心,
|
||||
那么控制器将给那个有 2 CPU 的区域分配两倍数量的端点。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
The following example shows what an EndpointSlice looks like when hints have
|
||||
been populated:
|
||||
-->
|
||||
以下示例展示了提供提示信息后 EndpointSlice 的样子:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
apiVersion: discovery.k8s.io/v1
|
||||
kind: EndpointSlice
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: example-hints
|
||||
labels:
|
||||
kubernetes.io/service-name: example-svc
|
||||
addressType: IPv4
|
||||
ports:
|
||||
- name: http
|
||||
protocol: TCP
|
||||
port: 80
|
||||
endpoints:
|
||||
- addresses:
|
||||
- "10.1.2.3"
|
||||
conditions:
|
||||
ready: true
|
||||
hostname: pod-1
|
||||
zone: zone-a
|
||||
hints:
|
||||
forZones:
|
||||
- name: "zone-a"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### kube-proxy {#implementation-kube-proxy}
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
The kube-proxy component filters the endpoints it routes to based on the hints set by
|
||||
the EndpointSlice controller. In most cases, this means that the kube-proxy is able
|
||||
to route traffic to endpoints in the same zone. Sometimes the controller allocates endpoints
|
||||
from a different zone to ensure more even distribution of endpoints between zones.
|
||||
This would result in some traffic being routed to other zones.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
kube-proxy 组件依据 EndpointSlice 控制器设置的提示,过滤由它负责路由的端点。
|
||||
在大多数场合,这意味着 kube-proxy 可以把流量路由到同一个区域的端点。
|
||||
有时,控制器在另一不同的区域中分配端点,以确保在多个区域之间更平均地分配端点。
|
||||
这会导致部分流量被路由到其他区域。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## Safeguards
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 保护措施 {#safeguards}
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
The Kubernetes control plane and the kube-proxy on each node apply some
|
||||
safeguard rules before using Topology Aware Hints. If these don't check out,
|
||||
the kube-proxy selects endpoints from anywhere in your cluster, regardless of the
|
||||
zone.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
Kubernetes 控制平面和每个节点上的 kube-proxy 在使用拓扑感知提示信息前,会应用一些保护措施规则。
|
||||
如果规则无法顺利通过,kube-proxy 将无视区域限制,从集群中的任意位置选择端点。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
1. **Insufficient number of endpoints:** If there are less endpoints than zones
|
||||
in a cluster, the controller will not assign any hints.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
1. **端点数量不足:** 如果一个集群中,端点数量少于区域数量,控制器不创建任何提示。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
2. **Impossible to achieve balanced allocation:** In some cases, it will be
|
||||
impossible to achieve a balanced allocation of endpoints among zones. For
|
||||
example, if zone-a is twice as large as zone-b, but there are only 2
|
||||
endpoints, an endpoint allocated to zone-a may receive twice as much traffic
|
||||
as zone-b. The controller does not assign hints if it can't get this "expected
|
||||
overload" value below an acceptable threshold for each zone. Importantly this
|
||||
is not based on real-time feedback. It is still possible for individual
|
||||
endpoints to become overloaded.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
2. **不可能实现均衡分配:** 在一些场合中,不可能实现端点在区域中的平衡分配。
|
||||
例如,假设 zone-a 比 zone-b 大两倍,但只有 2 个端点,
|
||||
那分配到 zone-a 的端点可能收到比 zone-b 多两倍的流量。
|
||||
如果控制器不能确保此“期望的过载”值低于每一个区域可接受的阈值,控制器将不添加提示信息。
|
||||
重要的是,这不是基于实时反馈。所以对于特定的端点仍有可能超载。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
3. **One or more Nodes has insufficient information:** If any node does not have
|
||||
a `topology.kubernetes.io/zone` label or is not reporting a value for
|
||||
allocatable CPU, the control plane does not set any topology-aware endpoint
|
||||
hints and so kube-proxy does not filter endpoints by zone.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
3. **一个或多个 Node 信息不足:** 如果任一节点没有设置标签 `topology.kubernetes.io/zone`,
|
||||
或没有上报可分配的 CPU 数据,控制平面将不会设置任何拓扑感知提示,
|
||||
进而 kube-proxy 也就不能根据区域来过滤端点。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
4. **One or more endpoints does not have a zone hint:** When this happens,
|
||||
the kube-proxy assumes that a transition from or to Topology Aware Hints is
|
||||
underway. Filtering endpoints for a Service in this state would be dangerous
|
||||
so the kube-proxy falls back to using all endpoints.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
4. **至少一个端点没有设置区域提示:** 当这种情况发生时,
|
||||
kube-proxy 会假设从拓扑感知提示到拓扑感知路由(或反方向)的迁移仍在进行中,
|
||||
在这种场合下过滤 Service 的端点是有风险的,所以 kube-proxy 回退到使用所有端点。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
5. **A zone is not represented in hints:** If the kube-proxy is unable to find
|
||||
at least one endpoint with a hint targeting the zone it is running in, it falls
|
||||
back to using endpoints from all zones. This is most likely to happen as you add
|
||||
a new zone into your existing cluster.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
5. **提示中不存在某区域:** 如果 kube-proxy 无法找到提示中指向它当前所在的区域的端点,
|
||||
它将回退到使用来自所有区域的端点。当你向现有集群新增新的区域时,这种情况发生概率很高。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## Constraints
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 限制 {#constraints}
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
* Topology Aware Hints are not used when either `externalTrafficPolicy` or
|
||||
`internalTrafficPolicy` is set to `Local` on a Service. It is possible to use
|
||||
both features in the same cluster on different Services, just not on the same
|
||||
Service.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
* 当 Service 的 `externalTrafficPolicy` 或 `internalTrafficPolicy` 设置值为 `Local` 时,
|
||||
系统将不使用拓扑感知提示信息。你可以在同一集群中的不同服务上使用这两个特性,但不能在同一个服务上这么做。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
* This approach will not work well for Services that have a large proportion of
|
||||
traffic originating from a subset of zones. Instead this assumes that incoming
|
||||
traffic will be roughly proportional to the capacity of the Nodes in each
|
||||
zone.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
* 这种方法不适用于大部分流量来自于一部分区域的 Service。
|
||||
相反,这项技术的假设是入站流量与各区域中节点的服务能力成比例关系。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
* The EndpointSlice controller ignores unready nodes as it calculates the
|
||||
proportions of each zone. This could have unintended consequences if a large
|
||||
portion of nodes are unready.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
* EndpointSlice 控制器在计算各区域的比例时,会忽略未就绪的节点。
|
||||
在大部分节点未就绪的场景下,这样做会带来非预期的结果。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
* The EndpointSlice controller ignores nodes with the
|
||||
`node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane` or `node-role.kubernetes.io/master`
|
||||
label set. This could be problematic if workloads are also running on those
|
||||
nodes.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
* EndpointSlice 控制器忽略设置了 `node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane` 或
|
||||
`node-role.kubernetes.io/master` 标签的节点。如果工作负载也在这些节点上运行,也可能会产生问题。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
* The EndpointSlice controller does not take into account {{< glossary_tooltip
|
||||
text="tolerations" term_id="toleration" >}} when deploying or calculating the
|
||||
proportions of each zone. If the Pods backing a Service are limited to a
|
||||
subset of Nodes in the cluster, this will not be taken into account.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
* EndpointSlice 控制器在分派或计算各区域的比例时,并不会考虑
|
||||
{{< glossary_tooltip text="容忍度" term_id="toleration" >}}。
|
||||
如果 Service 背后的各 Pod 被限制只能运行在集群节点的一个子集上,计算比例时不会考虑这点。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
* This may not work well with autoscaling. For example, if a lot of traffic is
|
||||
originating from a single zone, only the endpoints allocated to that zone will
|
||||
be handling that traffic. That could result in {{< glossary_tooltip
|
||||
text="Horizontal Pod Autoscaler" term_id="horizontal-pod-autoscaler" >}}
|
||||
either not picking up on this event, or newly added pods starting in a
|
||||
different zone.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
* 这项技术和自动扩缩容机制之间可能存在冲突。例如,如果大量流量来源于同一个区域,
|
||||
那只有分配到该区域的端点才可用来处理流量。这会导致
|
||||
{{< glossary_tooltip text="Pod 自动水平扩缩容" term_id="horizontal-pod-autoscaler" >}}
|
||||
要么不能处理这种场景,要么会在别的区域添加 Pod。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## Custom heuristics
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 自定义启发方式 {#custom-heuristics}
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Kubernetes is deployed in many different ways, there is no single heuristic for
|
||||
allocating endpoints to zones will work for every use case. A key goal of this
|
||||
feature is to enable custom heuristics to be developed if the built in heuristic
|
||||
does not work for your use case. The first steps to enable custom heuristics
|
||||
were included in the 1.27 release. This is a limited implementation that may not
|
||||
yet cover some relevant and plausible situations.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
Kubernetes 的部署方式有很多种,没有一种按区域分配端点的启发式方法能够适用于所有场景。
|
||||
此特性的一个关键目标是:如果内置的启发方式不能满足你的使用场景,则可以开发自定义的启发方式。
|
||||
启用自定义启发方式的第一步包含在了 1.27 版本中。
|
||||
这是一个限制性较强的实现,可能尚未涵盖一些重要的、可进一步探索的场景。
|
||||
|
||||
## {{% heading "whatsnext" %}}
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
* Follow the [Connecting Applications with Services](/docs/tutorials/services/connect-applications-service/) tutorial
|
||||
-->
|
||||
* 参阅[使用 Service 连接到应用](/zh-cn/docs/tutorials/services/connect-applications-service/)教程
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue