Update content/en/blog/_posts/2022-08-18-kubernetes-1.24-release-interview.md

Co-authored-by: James Laverack <james@jameslaverack.com>
pull/36051/head
craigbox 2022-08-18 16:38:43 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 7d46eeb5df
commit 6dac3c9670
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ JAMES LAVERACK: No, I don't think so. I think we had enough going on.
**CRAIG BOX: The release team is obviously beholden to what features the SIGs are developing and what their plans are. Is there ever any coordination between the release process and the SIGs in terms of things like saying, this release is going to be a catch-up release, like the old Snow Leopard releases for macOS, for example, where we say we don't want as many new features, but we really want more stabilization, and could you please work on those kind of things?**
JAMES LAVERACK: Not really. The cornerstone of a Kubernetes organization is the SIGs themselves, so the special interest groups that make up the organization. It's really up to them what they want to do. We don't do any particular coordination on the style of thing that should be implemented. A lot of SIGs have roadmaps, are looking over multiple releases to try to get features that they think are important in.
JAMES LAVERACK: Not really. The cornerstone of a Kubernetes organization is the SIGs themselves, so the special interest groups that make up the organization. It's really up to them what they want to do. We don't do any particular coordination on the style of thing that should be implemented. A lot of SIGs have roadmaps that are looking over multiple releases to try to get features that they think are important in.
**CRAIG BOX: Let's talk about some of the new features in 1.24. We have been hearing for many releases now about the impending doom which is the removal of Dockershim. [It is gone in 1.24](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/2221). Do we worry?**