Clean up 2024-08-16-matchlabelkeys-podaffinity.md
parent
0aeb9c50a1
commit
446d465879
|
@ -7,25 +7,25 @@ author: >
|
|||
Kensei Nakada (Tetrate)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes 1.29 introduced new fields `MatchLabelKeys` and `MismatchLabelKeys` in PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity.
|
||||
Kubernetes 1.29 introduced new fields `matchLabelKeys` and `mismatchLabelKeys` in `podAffinity` and `podAntiAffinity`.
|
||||
|
||||
In Kubernetes 1.31, this feature moves to beta and the corresponding feature gate (`MatchLabelKeysInPodAffinity`) gets enabled by default.
|
||||
|
||||
## `MatchLabelKeys` - Enhanced scheduling for versatile rolling updates
|
||||
## `matchLabelKeys` - Enhanced scheduling for versatile rolling updates
|
||||
|
||||
During a workload's (e.g., Deployment) rolling update, a cluster may have Pods from multiple versions at the same time.
|
||||
However, the scheduler cannot distinguish between old and new versions based on the `LabelSelector` specified in PodAffinity or PodAntiAffinity. As a result, it will co-locate or disperse Pods regardless of their versions.
|
||||
During a workload's (e.g., Deployment) rolling update, a cluster may have Pods from multiple versions at the same time.
|
||||
However, the scheduler cannot distinguish between old and new versions based on the `labelSelector` specified in `podAffinity` or `podAntiAffinity`. As a result, it will co-locate or disperse Pods regardless of their versions.
|
||||
|
||||
This can lead to sub-optimal scheduling outcome, for example:
|
||||
- New version Pods are co-located with old version Pods (PodAffinity), which will eventually be removed after rolling updates.
|
||||
- Old version Pods are distributed across all available topologies, preventing new version Pods from finding nodes due to PodAntiAffinity.
|
||||
- New version Pods are co-located with old version Pods (`podAffinity`), which will eventually be removed after rolling updates.
|
||||
- Old version Pods are distributed across all available topologies, preventing new version Pods from finding nodes due to `podAntiAffinity`.
|
||||
|
||||
`MatchLabelKeys` is a set of Pod label keys and addresses this problem.
|
||||
The scheduler looks up the values of these keys from the new Pod's labels and combines them with `LabelSelector`
|
||||
so that PodAffinity matches Pods that have the same key-value in labels.
|
||||
`matchLabelKeys` is a set of Pod label keys and addresses this problem.
|
||||
The scheduler looks up the values of these keys from the new Pod's labels and combines them with `labelSelector`
|
||||
so that podAffinity matches Pods that have the same key-value in labels.
|
||||
|
||||
By using label [pod-template-hash](/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/deployment/#pod-template-hash-label) in `MatchLabelKeys`,
|
||||
you can ensure that only Pods of the same version are evaluated for PodAffinity or PodAntiAffinity.
|
||||
By using label [pod-template-hash](/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/deployment/#pod-template-hash-label) in `matchLabelKeys`,
|
||||
you can ensure that only Pods of the same version are evaluated for `podAffinity` or `podAntiAffinity`.
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
apiVersion: apps/v1
|
||||
|
@ -43,11 +43,11 @@ metadata:
|
|||
values:
|
||||
- database
|
||||
topologyKey: topology.kubernetes.io/zone
|
||||
matchLabelKeys:
|
||||
matchLabelKeys:
|
||||
- pod-template-hash
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The above matchLabelKeys will be translated in Pods like:
|
||||
The above `matchLabelKeys` will be translated in Pods like:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
kind: Pod
|
||||
|
@ -68,26 +68,26 @@ metadata:
|
|||
- key: pod-template-hash # Added from matchLabelKeys; Only Pods from the same replicaset will match this affinity.
|
||||
operator: In
|
||||
values:
|
||||
- xyz
|
||||
- xyz
|
||||
topologyKey: topology.kubernetes.io/zone
|
||||
matchLabelKeys:
|
||||
matchLabelKeys:
|
||||
- pod-template-hash
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## `MismatchLabelKeys` - Service isolation
|
||||
## `mismatchLabelKeys` - Service isolation
|
||||
|
||||
`MismatchLabelKeys` is a set of Pod label keys, like `MatchLabelKeys`,
|
||||
which looks up the values of these keys from the new Pod's labels, and merge them with `LabelSelector` as `key notin (value)`
|
||||
so that PodAffinity does _not_ match Pods that have the same key-value in labels.
|
||||
`mismatchLabelKeys` is a set of Pod label keys, like `matchLabelKeys`,
|
||||
which looks up the values of these keys from the new Pod's labels, and merge them with `labelSelector` as `key notin (value)`
|
||||
so that `podAffinity` does _not_ match Pods that have the same key-value in labels.
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose all Pods for each tenant get `tenant` label via a controller or a manifest management tool like Helm.
|
||||
Suppose all Pods for each tenant get `tenant` label via a controller or a manifest management tool like Helm.
|
||||
|
||||
Although the value of `tenant` label is unknown when composing each workload's manifest,
|
||||
Although the value of `tenant` label is unknown when composing each workload's manifest,
|
||||
the cluster admin wants to achieve exclusive 1:1 tenant to domain placement for a tenant isolation.
|
||||
|
||||
`MismatchLabelKeys` works for this usecase;
|
||||
By applying the following affinity globally using a mutating webhook,
|
||||
the cluster admin can ensure that the Pods from the same tenant will land on the same domain exclusively,
|
||||
`mismatchLabelKeys` works for this usecase;
|
||||
By applying the following affinity globally using a mutating webhook,
|
||||
the cluster admin can ensure that the Pods from the same tenant will land on the same domain exclusively,
|
||||
meaning Pods from other tenants won't land on the same domain.
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
|
@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ affinity:
|
|||
topologyKey: node-pool
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The above matchLabelKeys and mismatchLabelKeys will be translated to like:
|
||||
The above `matchLabelKeys` and `mismatchLabelKeys` will be translated to like:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
kind: Pod
|
||||
|
@ -140,17 +140,17 @@ spec:
|
|||
- key: tenant
|
||||
operator: NotIn
|
||||
values:
|
||||
- service-a
|
||||
- service-a
|
||||
topologyKey: node-pool
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Getting involved
|
||||
## Getting involved
|
||||
|
||||
These features are managed by Kubernetes [SIG Scheduling](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/sig-scheduling).
|
||||
|
||||
Please join us and share your feedback. We look forward to hearing from you!
|
||||
|
||||
## How can I learn more?
|
||||
## How can I learn more?
|
||||
|
||||
- [The official document of PodAffinity](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/assign-pod-node/#inter-pod-affinity-and-anti-affinity)
|
||||
- [KEP-3633: Introduce MatchLabelKeys and MismatchLabelKeys to PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-scheduling/3633-matchlabelkeys-to-podaffinity/README.md#story-2)
|
||||
- [The official document of podAffinity](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/assign-pod-node/#inter-pod-affinity-and-anti-affinity)
|
||||
- [KEP-3633: Introduce matchLabelKeys and mismatchLabelKeys to podAffinity and podAntiAffinity](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-scheduling/3633-matchlabelkeys-to-podaffinity/README.md#story-2)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue