fix style and grammar
1. Make plural nouns into same style. See it is `Services` in first sentence and `Pods` in the line 286 , but others are `Service`s and `Pod`s .So change style for these plural nouns for consistency and beauty. 2. Fix minor grammar.pull/2053/head
parent
67be6311ee
commit
42e015d8f8
|
@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ title: Debugging Services
|
|||
---
|
||||
|
||||
An issue that comes up rather frequently for new installations of Kubernetes is
|
||||
that `Services` are not working properly. You've run all your `Pod`s and
|
||||
`Deployment`s, but you get no response when you try to access them.
|
||||
that `Services` are not working properly. You've run all your `Pods` and
|
||||
`Deployments`, but you get no response when you try to access them.
|
||||
This document will hopefully help you to figure out what's going wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
* TOC
|
||||
|
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ This document will hopefully help you to figure out what's going wrong.
|
|||
## Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
Throughout this doc you will see various commands that you can run. Some
|
||||
commands need to be run within `Pod`, others on a Kubernetes `Node`, and others
|
||||
commands need to be run within a `Pod`, others on a Kubernetes `Node`, and others
|
||||
can run anywhere you have `kubectl` and credentials for the cluster. To make it
|
||||
clear what is expected, this document will use the following conventions.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ $ kubectl exec -ti <POD-NAME> -c <CONTAINER-NAME> sh
|
|||
|
||||
## Setup
|
||||
|
||||
For the purposes of this walk-through, let's run some `Pod`s. Since you're
|
||||
For the purposes of this walk-through, let's run some `Pods`. Since you're
|
||||
probably debugging your own `Service` you can substitute your own details, or you
|
||||
can follow along and get a second data point.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ spec:
|
|||
protocol: TCP
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Confirm your `Pod`s are running:
|
||||
Confirm your `Pods` are running:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
$ kubectl get pods -l app=hostnames
|
||||
|
@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ Address: 10.0.1.175
|
|||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If this fails, perhaps your `Pod` and `Service` are in different
|
||||
`Namespace`s, try a namespace-qualified name:
|
||||
`Namespaces`, try a namespace-qualified name:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
u@pod$ nslookup hostnames.default
|
||||
|
@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ Name: hostnames.default
|
|||
Address: 10.0.1.175
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If this works, you'll need to ensure that `Pod`s and `Service`s run in the same
|
||||
If this works, you'll need to ensure that `Pods` and `Services` run in the same
|
||||
`Namespace`. If this still fails, try a fully-qualified name:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
|
@ -326,18 +326,18 @@ $ kubectl get service hostnames -o json
|
|||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Is the port you are trying to access in `spec.ports[]`? Is the `targetPort`
|
||||
correct for your `Pod`s? If you meant it to be a numeric port, is it a number
|
||||
(9376) or a string "9376"? If you meant it to be a named port, do your `Pod`s
|
||||
correct for your `Pods`? If you meant it to be a numeric port, is it a number
|
||||
(9376) or a string "9376"? If you meant it to be a named port, do your `Pods`
|
||||
expose a port with the same name? Is the port's `protocol` the same as the
|
||||
`Pod`'s?
|
||||
|
||||
## Does the Service have any Endpoints?
|
||||
|
||||
If you got this far, we assume that you have confirmed that your `Service`
|
||||
exists and resolves by DNS. Now let's check that the `Pod`s you ran are
|
||||
exists and is resolved by DNS. Now let's check that the `Pods` you ran are
|
||||
actually being selected by the `Service`.
|
||||
|
||||
Earlier we saw that the `Pod`s were running. We can re-check that:
|
||||
Earlier we saw that the `Pods` were running. We can re-check that:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
$ kubectl get pods -l app=hostnames
|
||||
|
@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ hostnames-bvc05 1/1 Running 0 1h
|
|||
hostnames-yp2kp 1/1 Running 0 1h
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The "AGE" column says that these `Pod`s are about an hour old, which implies that
|
||||
The "AGE" column says that these `Pods` are about an hour old, which implies that
|
||||
they are running fine and not crashing.
|
||||
|
||||
The `-l app=hostnames` argument is a label selector - just like our `Service`
|
||||
|
@ -360,16 +360,16 @@ NAME ENDPOINTS
|
|||
hostnames 10.244.0.5:9376,10.244.0.6:9376,10.244.0.7:9376
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This confirms that the control loop has found the correct `Pod`s for your
|
||||
This confirms that the control loop has found the correct `Pods` for your
|
||||
`Service`. If the `hostnames` row is blank, you should check that the
|
||||
`spec.selector` field of your `Service` actually selects for `metadata.labels`
|
||||
values on your `Pod`s.
|
||||
values on your `Pods`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Are the Pods working?
|
||||
|
||||
At this point, we know that your `Service` exists and has selected your `Pod`s.
|
||||
Let's check that the `Pod`s are actually working - we can bypass the `Service`
|
||||
mechanism and go straight to the `Pod`s.
|
||||
At this point, we know that your `Service` exists and has selected your `Pods`.
|
||||
Let's check that the `Pods` are actually working - we can bypass the `Service`
|
||||
mechanism and go straight to the `Pods`.
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
u@pod$ wget -qO- 10.244.0.5:9376
|
||||
|
@ -384,19 +384,19 @@ hostnames-yp2kp
|
|||
|
||||
We expect each `Pod` in the `Endpoints` list to return its own hostname. If
|
||||
this is not what happens (or whatever the correct behavior is for your own
|
||||
`Pod`s), you should investigate what's happening there. You might find
|
||||
`kubectl logs` to be useful or `kubectl exec` directly to your `Pod`s and check
|
||||
`Pods`), you should investigate what's happening there. You might find
|
||||
`kubectl logs` to be useful or `kubectl exec` directly to your `Pods` and check
|
||||
service from there.
|
||||
|
||||
## Is the kube-proxy working?
|
||||
|
||||
If you get here, your `Service` is running, has `Endpoints`, and your `Pod`s
|
||||
If you get here, your `Service` is running, has `Endpoints`, and your `Pods`
|
||||
are actually serving. At this point, the whole `Service` proxy mechanism is
|
||||
suspect. Let's confirm it, piece by piece.
|
||||
|
||||
### Is kube-proxy running?
|
||||
|
||||
Confirm that `kube-proxy` is running on your `Node`s. You should get something
|
||||
Confirm that `kube-proxy` is running on your `Nodes`. You should get something
|
||||
like the below:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
|
@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ should double-check your `Node` configuration and installation steps.
|
|||
### Is kube-proxy writing iptables rules?
|
||||
|
||||
One of the main responsibilities of `kube-proxy` is to write the `iptables`
|
||||
rules which implement `Service`s. Let's check that those rules are getting
|
||||
rules which implement `Services`. Let's check that those rules are getting
|
||||
written.
|
||||
|
||||
The kube-proxy can run in either "userspace" mode or "iptables" mode.
|
||||
|
@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1460 Metric:1
|
|||
## Seek help
|
||||
|
||||
If you get this far, something very strange is happening. Your `Service` is
|
||||
running, has `Endpoints`, and your `Pod`s are actually serving. You have DNS
|
||||
running, has `Endpoints`, and your `Pods` are actually serving. You have DNS
|
||||
working, `iptables` rules installed, and `kube-proxy` does not seem to be
|
||||
misbehaving. And yet your `Service` is not working. You should probably let
|
||||
us know, so we can help investigate!
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue