[zh-cn] add contribute/blog/buddying.md
Signed-off-by: xin.li <xin.li@daocloud.io>pull/50433/head
parent
aa153f8a87
commit
3ea0731b39
|
@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: 作为博客写作伙伴提供帮助
|
||||
slug: writing-buddy
|
||||
content_type: concept
|
||||
weight: 70
|
||||
---
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
title: Helping as a blog writing buddy
|
||||
slug: writing-buddy
|
||||
content_type: concept
|
||||
weight: 70
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- overview -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
There are two official Kubernetes blogs, and the CNCF has its own blog where you can cover Kubernetes too.
|
||||
Read [contributing to Kubernetes blogs](/docs/contribute/blog/) to learn about these two blogs.
|
||||
|
||||
When people contributor to either blog as an author, the Kubernetes project pairs up authors
|
||||
as _writing buddies_. This page explains how to fulfil the buddy role.
|
||||
|
||||
You should make sure that you have at least read an outline of [article submission](/docs/contribute/blog/submission/)
|
||||
before you read on within this page.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
Kubernetes 有两个官方博客,同时 CNCF 也有自己的博客,你也可以在其中撰写与 Kubernetes 相关的内容。
|
||||
阅读[为 Kubernetes 博客贡献内容](/zh-cn/docs/contribute/blog/)以了解这两个博客的详细信息。
|
||||
|
||||
当人们作为作者为任一博客撰稿时,Kubernetes 项目会将作者配对为**写作伙伴**。
|
||||
本页面解释了如何履行伙伴角色。
|
||||
|
||||
在继续阅读本页面之前,你应该确保至少已经阅读了[文章提交](/zh-cn/docs/contribute/blog/submission/)的概述。
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- body -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## Buddy responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
As a writing buddy, you:
|
||||
|
||||
* help the blog team get articles ready to merge and to publish
|
||||
* support your buddy to produce content that is good to merge
|
||||
* provide a review on the article that your buddy has written
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 伙伴职责
|
||||
|
||||
作为写作伙伴,你的职责包括:
|
||||
|
||||
* 协助博客团队准备文章,使其达到可合并和发布的状态;
|
||||
* 支持你的伙伴创作高质量的内容,确保其适合合并;
|
||||
* 对你伙伴撰写的文章提供审阅意见。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
When the team pairs you up with another author, the idea is that you both support each other by
|
||||
reviewing the other author's draft article.
|
||||
Most people reading articles on the Kubernetes blog are not experts; the content should
|
||||
try to make sense for that audience, or at least to support non-expert readers appropriately.
|
||||
|
||||
The blog team are also there to help you both along the journey from draft to publication.
|
||||
They will either be directly able to approve your article for publication, or can arrange for
|
||||
the approval to happen.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
当团队将你与另一位作者配对时,理念是你们通过互相审阅对方的草稿文章来彼此支持。
|
||||
大多数阅读 Kubernetes 博客文章的读者并非专家;
|
||||
内容应当尝试为这类读者群体提供易于理解的信息,或者至少适当地支持非专家读者。
|
||||
|
||||
博客团队也会在整个从草稿到发布的流程中帮助你们。他们可以直接批准你的文章发布,
|
||||
或者安排相应的批准流程。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## Supporting the blog team
|
||||
|
||||
Your main responsibility here is to communicate about your capacity, availability and progress
|
||||
in a reasonable timeline. If many weeks go by and your buddy hasn't heard from you, it makes
|
||||
the overall work take more time.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 支持博客团队
|
||||
|
||||
你的主要职责是及时沟通你的工作量、可用时间以及进展情况。如果几周过去了,
|
||||
你的伙伴还没有收到你的消息,这将会导致整体工作花费更多的时间。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## Supporting your buddy
|
||||
|
||||
There are two parts to the process
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 支持你的伙伴
|
||||
|
||||
支持伙伴的过程分为两个部分:
|
||||
|
||||
{{< tabs name="buddy_support" >}}
|
||||
{{% tab name="协同编辑" %}}
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
**(This is the recommended option)**
|
||||
|
||||
The blog team recommend that the main author for the article sets up collaborative editing
|
||||
using either a Google Doc or HackMD (their choice). The main author then shares that document
|
||||
with the following people:
|
||||
|
||||
* Any co-authors
|
||||
* You (their writing buddy)
|
||||
* Ideally, with a nominated
|
||||
person from the blog team.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
**(这是推荐的选项)**
|
||||
|
||||
博客团队建议文章的主要作者通过 Google Doc 或 HackMD(由作者选择)构造协作编辑环境。
|
||||
之后,主作者将该文档共享给以下人员:
|
||||
|
||||
- 所有共同作者
|
||||
- 你(他们的写作伙伴)
|
||||
- 理想情况下,还应包括一位博客团队中指定的负责人。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
As a writing buddy, you then read the draft text and either directly make suggestions or provide
|
||||
feedback in a different way. The author of the blog is very commonly also **your** writing buddy in turn, so they will provide the
|
||||
same kind of feedback on the draft for your blog article.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
作为写作伙伴,你需要阅读草稿内容,并直接提出建议或以其他方式提供反馈。
|
||||
博客文章的作者通常也会反过来成为**你的**写作伙伴,
|
||||
因此他们会针对你所撰写的文章草稿提供类似的反馈。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Your role here is to recommend the smallest set of changes that will get the article look good
|
||||
for publication. If there's a diagram that really doesn't make sense, or the writing is really
|
||||
unclear: provide feedback. If you have a slight different of opinion about wording or punctuation,
|
||||
skip it. Let the article author(s) write in their own style, provided that they align to
|
||||
the [blog guidelines](/docs/contribute/blog/guidelines/).
|
||||
|
||||
After this is ready, the lead author will open a pull request and use Markdown to submit the
|
||||
article. You then provide a [review](#pull-request-review).
|
||||
-->
|
||||
你的角色是推荐最小的修改集,以使文章适合发布。如果某个图表完全无法理解,
|
||||
或者文字表达非常不清晰,请提供反馈。如果你对措辞或标点符号有轻微的不同意见,
|
||||
请忽略它。只要符合[博客指南](/zh-cn/docs/contribute/blog/guidelines/),
|
||||
让文章作者以他们自己的风格写作即可。
|
||||
|
||||
在此完成后,主作者将发起一个 PR 并使用 Markdown 提交文章。
|
||||
然后你可以提供[审阅](#pull-request-review)意见。
|
||||
|
||||
{{% /tab %}}
|
||||
{{% tab name="Markdown / Git 编辑" %}}
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Some authors prefer to start with
|
||||
[collaborative editing](#buddy-support-0); others like to go straight into
|
||||
GitHub.
|
||||
|
||||
Whichever route they take, your role is to provide feedback that lets the blog team provide
|
||||
a simple signoff and confirm that the article can merge as a draft. See
|
||||
[submitting articles to Kubernetes blogs](/docs/contribute/blog/submission/) for what the authors
|
||||
need to do.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
一些作者更喜欢从[协同编辑](#buddy-support-0)开始,
|
||||
而另一些人则喜欢直接进入 GitHub。
|
||||
|
||||
无论他们选择哪种方式,你的角色是提供反馈,使博客团队能够轻松完成审核,
|
||||
并确认文章可以作为草稿合并。有关作者需要完成的操作,
|
||||
请参阅[向 Kubernetes 博客提交文章](/zh-cn/docs/contribute/blog/submission/)。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Use GitHub suggestions to point out any required changes.
|
||||
|
||||
Once the Markdown and other content (such as images) look right, you provide a
|
||||
formal [review](#pull-request-review).
|
||||
-->
|
||||
使用 GitHub 的建议功能指出需要修改的地方。
|
||||
|
||||
一旦 Markdown 文件和其他内容(例如图片)看起来没有问题,
|
||||
你就可以提供正式的[审阅](#pull-request-review)意见。
|
||||
|
||||
{{% /tab %}}
|
||||
{{< /tabs >}}
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## Pull request review
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the [blog](/docs/contribute/review/reviewing-prs/#blog) section of _Reviewing pull requests_.
|
||||
|
||||
When you think that the open blog pull request is good enough to merge, add the `/lgtm` comment to the pull request.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 审阅 PR
|
||||
|
||||
遵循**审阅 PR **一文的[博客](/zh-cn/docs/contribute/review/reviewing-prs/#blog)部分所给的要求。
|
||||
|
||||
当你认为所发起的博客 PR 足够好可以合并时,在 PR 中添加 `/lgtm` 评论。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
This indicates to the repository automation tooling (Prow) that the content "looks good to me". Prow moves things forward. The `/lgtm` command lets you add your opinion to the record whether or not you are formally a member of the Kubernetes project.
|
||||
|
||||
Either you or the article author(s) should let the blog team know that there is an article
|
||||
ready for signoff. It should already be marked as `draft: true` in the front matter, as
|
||||
explained in the submission guidance.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
这一注释向仓库自动化工具(Prow)内容申明内容“在我看来没有问题”。
|
||||
Prow 会推进相关流程。`/lgtm` 命令允许你将自己的意见公开出来,
|
||||
无论你是否正式成为 Kubernetes 项目的一员。
|
||||
|
||||
你或文章作者应通知博客团队有文章已准备好进行签发。根据提交指南,
|
||||
文章前面应已标记为 `draft: true`。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
## Subsequent steps
|
||||
|
||||
For you as a writing buddy, **there is no step four**. Once the pull request is good to merge,
|
||||
the blog team (or, for the contributor site, the contributor comms team) take things from there.
|
||||
It's possible that you'll need to return to an earlier step based on feedback, but you can usually expect that your work as a buddy is done.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
## 后续步骤
|
||||
|
||||
作为写作伙伴,**没有第四步**。一旦 PR 准备好合并,
|
||||
博客团队(或者,对于贡献者网站,贡献者通信团队)将会接手。
|
||||
根据反馈,你可能需要返回到前面的步骤,但通常你可以认为作为伙伴的工作已经完成。
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue