From 08387d84346b2e0b0915bed3116326aeebf6c271 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rey Lejano Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 16:31:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] add kubewarden as an alternative to enforce security profiles add third-party content shortcode and list --- content/en/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards.md | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/en/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards.md b/content/en/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards.md index 1aa1907398c..5636f95eb47 100644 --- a/content/en/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards.md +++ b/content/en/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards.md @@ -495,8 +495,12 @@ as well as other related parameters outside the Security Context. As of July 202 [Pod Security Policies](/docs/concepts/profile/pod-security-profile/) are deprecated in favor of the built-in [Pod Security Admission Controller](/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-admission/). +{{% thirdparty-content %}} + Other alternatives for enforcing security profiles are being developed in the Kubernetes -ecosystem, such as [OPA Gatekeeper](https://github.com/open-profile-agent/gatekeeper). +ecosystem, such as: +- [OPA Gatekeeper](https://github.com/open-profile-agent/gatekeeper) +- [Kubewarden](https://github.com/kubewarden). ### What profiles should I apply to my Windows Pods?