We need to be able to determine the cost of graph/node execution.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add these columns into CreditTransaction `metadata` column:
- graph_id
- node_id
- graph_exec_id
- node_exec_id
- block_id
* Drop the `blockId` column and backfill the dropped value into
metadata->>block_id.
* Frequent queries on these values will require an index created on
demand through a migration, depending on the use case.
---------
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Czerwinski <kpczerwinski@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
This PR adds Stripe integration and payment processing for topping-up
user accounts with credits.
### Changes 🏗️
Includes:
- https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/9176
#### Top-up flow
1. To top-up a user visits their settings and clicks `Credits` button
(it's unavailable if `NEXT_PUBLIC_STRIPE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY` isn't present)
2. User inputs top-up amount (min 5$ in 1$ increments) and click the
button to confirm.
3. Backend receives top-up request, creates database entry and requests
stripe to provide url for this specific checkout.
4. User gets redirected to externally hosted Stripe checkout page, after
payment (or cancelling) they get redirected back to Credits page.
5. In the meantime Stripe processes payment and sends webhook
confirmation to the backend, backend updates database to activate bought
credits.
6. Credits page shows success (or failure) information (by using url
param `topup=success|cancel`). Credit counter won't update without
refreshing the page unless payment was confirmed before user was back on
Credits page which is the case when testing checkout locally.
<img width="804" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-01 at 2 55 35 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/22fb518d-b30b-4154-bb4b-edea1d57b6c2"
/>
#### Backend
- Add `stripe` package
- Add environment variables:
- `STRIPE_API_KEY`
- `STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET`
- Add routes:
- `POST /credits`: top-up request, returns Stripe checkout url.
- `POST /credits/stripe_webhook`: Stripe webhook endpoint to notify of
successful payment.
- `PATCH /credits`: prompts beckend to check payment status. It's an
additional failsafe in case webhook fails.
- Update `credit.py` and related files to handle top-up request and
payment confirmation
#### Frontend
- Add `stripe-js` package
- Add `NEXT_PUBLIC_STRIPE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY` environment variable
- Modify user settings sidebar to show `Credits` if
`NEXT_PUBLIC_STRIPE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY` is available
- Add `store/credits` page where user can top-up their account, it shows
confirmation (or failure) after completing checkout.
- Add `useCredits` hook that returns user credits and allows to request
top-up.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
### Description
This PR enables the execution of store agents even if they are not owned
by the user. Key changes include handling store-listed agents in the
`get_graph` logic, improving execution flow, and ensuring
version-specific handling. These updates support more flexible agent
execution.
### Changes 🏗️
- **Graph Retrieval:** Updated `get_graph` to check store listings for
agents not owned by the user.
- **Version Handling:** Added `graph_version` to execution methods for
consistent version-specific execution.
- **Execution Flow:** Refactored `scheduler.py`, `rest_api.py`, and
other modules for clearer logic and better maintainability.
- **Testing:** Updated `test_manager.py` and other test cases to
validate execution of store-listed agents added test for accessing graph
---------
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
- resolves - #9120
### Changes
- Added a new endpoint to download agent files as JSON, allowing users
to retrieve agent data by store listing version ID and version number.
- Introduced a new `get_agent` function in the database module to fetch
agent details and prepare the graph data for download.
- Enhanced the frontend `AgentInfo` component to include a download
button, which triggers the download of the agent file.
- Integrated loading state and user feedback via toast notifications
during the download process.
- Updated the API client to support the new download functionality.
### Demo video
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6744a753-297f-4ccc-abde-f56ca24ed2d5
### Example Json
```json
{
"id": "14378095-4cc5-41ea-975e-bd0bce010bea",
"version": 1,
"is_active": true,
"is_template": false,
"name": "something",
"description": "1",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "6914efa0-e4fa-4ce8-802c-d5577cf061b6",
"block_id": "aeb08fc1-2fc1-4141-bc8e-f758f183a822",
"input_default": {},
"metadata": {
"position": {
"x": 756,
"y": 452.5
}
},
"input_links": [],
"output_links": [],
"webhook_id": null,
"graph_id": "14378095-4cc5-41ea-975e-bd0bce010bea",
"graph_version": 1,
"webhook": null
}
],
"links": [],
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {},
"required": []
},
"output_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {},
"required": []
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: SwiftyOS <craigswift13@gmail.com>
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/8739 causes input
fields that are supposed to be an advanced field end up being a
mandatory field:
*See the retry count field here.
### Changes 🏗️
Set the `advanced` field on each input field, and set the default value
using this logic:
* If it has a default value, set it to True.
* otherwise, False.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com>
First step for the PAYG System.
### Changes 🏗️
- Add `stripeCustomerId` to `User` model
- Rename model `UserBlockCredit` to `CreditTransaction`
- Rename model `UserBlockCreditType` to `CreditTransactionType`
- Update related code
- Add a migration
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
- Move `autogpt_libs.supabase_integration_credentials_store` into
`backend`
- `.store` -> `backend.integrations.credentials_store`
- `.types` -> added to `backend.data.model`
- Rename `SupabaseIntegrationCredentialsStore` to
`IntegrationCredentialsStore`
We wanted to get a few security things in quickly in #8403 and had to
make some compromises to do so. This picks those up and fixes them.
- Resolves#8540
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Aarushi <50577581+aarushik93@users.noreply.github.com>
We've started enabling cost based on the *partial value* of the
`credentials` field. And this logic has never been supported.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add partial object matching on the input data filter for evaluating
the block cost.
* Add missing credentials for `ExtractWebsiteContentBlock`
* Removed fallback cost on LLM blocks.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
Restructuring the Repo to make it clear the difference between classic autogpt and the autogpt platform:
* Move the "classic" projects `autogpt`, `forge`, `frontend`, and `benchmark` into a `classic` folder
* Also rename `autogpt` to `original_autogpt` for absolute clarity
* Rename `rnd/` to `autogpt_platform/`
* `rnd/autogpt_builder` -> `autogpt_platform/frontend`
* `rnd/autogpt_server` -> `autogpt_platform/backend`
* Adjust any paths accordingly
Zamil Majdy
Krzysztof Czerwinski
Aarushi
Swifty
Abhimanyu Yadav
Nicholas Tindle