db24838221
The low-level chunk storage shouldn't care about the table name (this is also true for parquet chunks btw). In fact, the table name is already only a partial information since it misses the namespace. If we need a table name, then the high-level chunk/data management is responsible for that. Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| database.rs | ||
| plain.rs | ||
| read.rs | ||
| read_filter.rs | ||
| read_group.rs | ||
| string.rs | ||
| sum_fixed.rs | ||