* fix: prevent retention service from hanging (#25055)
Fix issue that can cause the retention service to hang waiting on a
`Shard.Close` call. When this occurs, no other shards will be deleted
by the retention service. This is usually noticed as an increase in
disk usage because old shards are not cleaned up.
The fix adds to new methods to `Store`, `SetShardNewReadersBlocked`
and `InUse`. `InUse` can be used to poll if a shard has active readers,
which the retention service uses to skip over in-use shards to prevent
the service from hanging. `SetShardNewReadersBlocked` determines if
new read access may be granted to a shard. This is required to prevent
race conditions around the use of `InUse` and the deletion of shards.
If the retention service skips over a shard because it is in-use, the
shard will be checked again the next time the retention service is run.
It can be deleted on subsequent checks if it is no longer in-use. If
the shards is stuck in-use, the retention service will not be able to
delete the shards, which can be observed in the logs for manual
intervention. Other shards can still be deleted by the retention service
even if a shard is stuck with readers.
This is a port of ad68ec8 from master-1.x to main-2.x.
closes: #25076
(cherry picked from commit b4bd607eef)
Since possibly v0.9 DELETE SERIES has had the unwanted side effect of
removing series from the index when the last traces of series data are
removed from TSM. This occurred because the inmem index was rebuilt on
startup, and if there was no TSM data for a series then there could be
not series to add to the index.
This commit returns to the original (documented) DROP/DETETE SERIES
behaviour. As such, when issuing DROP SERIES all instances of matching
series will be removed from both the TSM engine and the index. When
issuing DELETE SERIES only TSM data will be removed.
It is up to the operator to remove series from the index.
NB, this commit does not address how to remove series data from the
series file when a shard rolls over.
The previous sha was taken from a revision on a devel branch that I
thought would continue staying in the tree after it was merged. That
revision was rebased away and the API was changed for the logger.
This updates the usage of the logger and adds a simple package for
constructing the base logger.
The 1.0 version of zap changed the format of the default console logger
so this change moves over to this new logger instead of attempting to
retain backwards compatibility with the old format.
This commit adds time support to SHOW TAG VALUES. Time can be used as
both a lower and upper boundary. However, there are some caveats.
For the `inmem` index, filtering by time will still return all results
because the index data is shared across shards.
For the `tsi1` index, filtering by time will only work down to the shard
lever. Specifically, when querying by time all shards within that time
range will be used to generate the results.
Fixes#8819.
Previously, the process of dropping expired shards according to the
retention policy duration, was managed by two independent goroutines in
the retention policy service. This behaviour was introduced in #2776,
at a time when there were both data and meta nodes in the OSS codebase.
The idea was that only the leader meta node would run the meta data
deletions in the first goroutine, and all other nodes would run the
local deletions in the second goroutine.
InfluxDB no longer operates in that way and so we ended up with two
independent goroutines that were carrying out an action that was really
dependent on each other.
If the second goroutine runs before the first then it may not see the
meta data changes indicating shards should be deleted and it won't
delete any shards locally. Shortly after this the first goroutine will
run and remove the meta data for the shard groups.
This results in a situation where it looks like the shards have gone,
but in fact they remain on disk (and importantly, their series within
the index) until the next time the second goroutine runs. By default
that's 30 minutes.
In the case where the shards to be removed would have removed the last
occurences of some series, then it's possible that if the database was already at its
maximum series limit (or tag limit for that matter), no further new series
can be inserted.
Geoffrey Wossum
Sam Arnold
Daniel Moran
sans
Stuart Carnie
Mark Rushakoff
Edd Robinson
Adam
Ben Johnson
Jonathan A. Sternberg