The initial benchmarks look like this on my i9 MBP:
```
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag0/no_pred 1.00 91.0±2.55ms ? ?/sec
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag0/with_pred 1.00 11.5±0.72ms ? ?/sec
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag1/no_pred 1.00 120.3±5.10ms ? ?/sec
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag1/with_pred 1.00 11.2±0.22ms ? ?/sec
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag2/no_pred 1.00 203.2±8.45ms ? ?/sec
Data in one open chunk and one closed chunk of mutable buffer/tag2/with_pred 1.00 11.2±0.21ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag0/no_pred 1.00 100.3±3.73ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag0/with_pred 1.00 31.2±1.80ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag1/no_pred 1.00 126.7±2.29ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag1/with_pred 1.00 33.0±1.70ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag2/no_pred 1.00 212.0±6.86ms ? ?/sec
Data in open chunk of mutable buffer, and one chunk of read buffer/tag2/with_pred 1.00 18.1±0.99ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag0/no_pred 1.00 98.7±6.08ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag0/with_pred 1.00 11.2±0.37ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag1/no_pred 1.00 118.9±3.97ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag1/with_pred 1.00 11.7±0.64ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag2/no_pred 1.00 202.1±8.49ms ? ?/sec
Data in single open chunk of mutable buffer/tag2/with_pred 1.00 11.1±0.27ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag0/no_pred 1.00 109.2±5.20ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag0/with_pred 1.00 44.2±1.83ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag1/no_pred 1.00 132.9±3.79ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag1/with_pred 1.00 41.7±2.43ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag2/no_pred 1.00 222.4±7.00ms ? ?/sec
Data in two read buffer chunks/tag2/with_pred 1.00 27.9±0.92ms ? ?/sec
```
This commit extends the ingest crate to support converting multiple TSM
files to a single Parquet file by merging identical measurements across
the TSM files.
This does not yet support merging blocks that overlap.
* feat: benchmark for lp->parquet performance
* feat: improve parser performance by storing contiguous EscapedStr
* fix: remove all string copies during LP-Parquet conversion
* refactor: Implement from_str as From<&str> only
* refactor: implement Deref instead of as_str
* refactor: Remove ends_with because Deref now makes it work
* refactor: Eq can be derived
* refactor: Remove unused From implementation
* refactor: Replace single-character strings with chars as requested by clippy
Co-authored-by: Carol (Nichols || Goulding) <carol.nichols@integer32.com>
* chore: Add a test that decodes the entire tsm index
* fix: update test and change example to not use hard coded len
* fix: comment cleanup
* fix: clippy
* fix: Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Carol (Nichols || Goulding) <193874+carols10cents@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jake Goulding <jake.goulding@integer32.com>
* fix: fmt/clippy after code review
Co-authored-by: Carol (Nichols || Goulding) <193874+carols10cents@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jake Goulding <jake.goulding@integer32.com>
Edd Robinson
alamb
Andrew Lamb