Based on @jwilder's alternative to the 'dirty' slice that featured
in previous iterations of this fix.
Suggested-by: Jason Wilder <jason@influxdb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon@wildducktheories.com>
Currently two compactors can execute Engine.WriteSnapshot at once.
This isn't thread safe since both threads want to make modifications to
Cache.snapshot at the same time.
This commit introduces a lock which is acquired during Snapshot() and
released during ClearSnapshot(), ensuring that at most one thread
executes within Engine.WriteSnapshot() at once.
To ensure that we always release this lock, but only release the
snapshot resources on a successful commit, we modify ClearSnapshot() to
accept a boolean which indicates whether the write was successful or not
and guarantee to call this function if Snapshot() has been called.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon@wildducktheories.com>
Fix for #5804.
The commit for #5789 rendered the semantics of snapshotCount statistic
useless. This commit restores semantics that have diagnostic value to
this statistic.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon@wildducktheories.com>
The Cache had support for taking multiple snapshots to support writing
multiple snapshots to TSM files concurrently if that happened to be
a bottleneck. In practice, this is never a bottleneck and we only
run one snappshoting goroutine continously per shard which has worked
well for all workloads.
The multiple snapshot support introduces some unhandled failure scenarios
where wal segments could be removed without writing them to TSM files. If
a snapshot compaction fails to write due to transient disk errors, subsequent
snapshots will continue, but the failed one will not be retried. When the
subsequent ones succeeded, all closed wal segments are removed causing data
loss.
This change simplifies the snapshotting capability to ensure that there is only
ever one snapshot. If one fails, the next snapshot will update the existing
snapshot and retry all of old and new data.
Fixes#5686
The cache had some incorrect logic for determine when a series needed
to be deduplicated. The logic was checking for unsorted points and
not considering duplicate points. This would manifest itself as many
points (duplicate) points being returned from the cache and after a
snapshot compaction run, the points would disappear because snapshot
compaction always deduplicates and sorts the points.
Added a test that reproduces the issue.
Fixes#5719
The intent of this change is to avoid writing caches created for
snapshot cache instances into the tsm1_cache measurement. We can do
this by avoiding use of the NewCache constructor. All other methods
are only intended to be called from on the engine cache - never
on a snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon@wildducktheories.com>
Since we are not locking but relying on atomic arithmetic,
use Add rather than Set. Will also result in slightly less garbage
being created.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon@wildducktheories.com>
The intent of this change is to ensure that all statistic fields of the
resulting tsm1_cache measurement are initialized on initialization of
the cache. That way, any consumer of those measurements doesn't
have to deal with the null case.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon@wildducktheories.com>
Complementing and extending the changes in #5758.
Add 2 level statistics:
* snapshotCount
* cacheAgeMs
Add 2 counter statistics
* cachedBytes
* WALCompactionTimeMs
snapshotCount can be used to measure transient write errors that are causing snapshots to accumulate
cacheAgeMs can be used to guage the level of write activity into the cache
The differences between cachedBytes stats sampled at different times can be used to calculate cache throughput rates
The ratio (cachedBytes-diskBytes)/WALCompactionTimeMs can be used calculate WAL compaction throughput.
The ratio of difference between first and last WAL compaction time over the interval
length is an estimate of percentage of cache throughput consumed.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon@wildducktheories.com>
This reduces some of the lock contention when writing to the cache.
When a new entry is created, it avoids an allocation. It also skips
a check to see if we need to sorted if we already know it needs to sorted.
Writing the snapshot would deduplicate the snapshot points
while still holding the engine write-lock. This can be expensive
under high load and cause writes to back up and OOM the server.
Instead, grab the snapshot under the lock and dedup it after releasing
the lock.
Possible fix for #5442
* Update cache loader to delete entries from cache
* Add cache.Delete()
* Update delete to look at keys in the Cache in addition to the FileStore
* Update cache compaction to never happen if the cache is empty
This change starts by building the sequence of entries, which also
allows the required size of destination buffer to be calculated. Then
the buffer is allocated up-front in 1 call.
Each snapshot and hot value-set is appended to the buffer. If ordering
is violated at anytime, set the 'needSort' flag. Sorting, if necessary,
is performed just before returning the data.
* Update cache to have a single slice of values for a key (removed checkpoints)
* Changed compact.Plan to only worry about TSM files.
* Updated Plan to not return an error since there was no case in which it would.
* Update WAL to not keep stats since they're no longer needed.
* Update engine to flush the Cache/WAL to a new TSM file when the min threshold is hit.
* Split compact logic between TSM compacts and WAL/Cache writes.
* Remove unnecessary merge iterator, wal segment iterator, and other no longer necessary stuff.
* Remove the asending bool from the Dedupe method. Values should always be in ascending order. It's up to the cursor to iterate through values based on the direction. Giving the cursor responsibility makes it so we don't need to sort, dedupe or reallocate anything for different query orders.
* Updated engine to use its locks to ensure writes and cache flushes don't cause a race.
* Update all tests with new signatures. Removed a bunch of tests around TSM rewrites and WAL segment iteration that are no longer necessary.