* chore: remove dead code
* refactor: move FluxLanguageService interface to fluxlang
* chore: run fmt
* refactor: move task.go from top level to task/taskmodel
* chore: run formatter
* chore: fix up import ordering with gci
* feat: update generate ticks into an array of properties for each axis
* fix: add missing operand
* chore: reorder properties to be consistent
* fix: update GenerateYAxisTicks to array of strings
* fix: change expected property to null
this also makes it so that an association (label) that is added to a
resource is also included in the returned output. There is 1 test that
was changed as part of this work. It is to test for this specific change
in behavior
references: #18646
this ability exports all resources associated with a stack by the same
metadata.name fields as the original application had done it. This can
be used as a means to snapshot the current state of the stack. This can
be used for source control or other means.
closes: #18271
notes on this commit. This commit was grueling ;-(. The task API is not a friendly
API to consume. There are a lot of non obvious things going on and almost every
one of them tripped me up. Things of note:
* the http.TaskService does not satisfy the influxdb.TaskService,
making it impossible to use as a dependency if tasks service gets
split out
* the APIs for create and update do not share common types. For example:
creating a task takes every field as a string, but in the update it is
taken as a options.Duration type. A step further and you'll notice that
create does not need an option to be provided, but the update does. Its
jarring trying to understand the indirection here. I struggled mightily
trying to make sense of it all with the indirection and differing types.
Made for a very difficult task (no pun intended) when it should have been
trivial. Opportunity here to fix these up and make this API more uniform
and remove unneccesary complexity like the options type.
* Nested IDs that get marshaled, are no bueno when you want to marshal a task
that does not have an ID in it, for either user/org/or self IDs. Its a challenge
just to do that.
* Lots of logs in the kv.Task portion where we hit errors and log and others where
we return. It isn't clear what is happening. The kv implementation is also very
procedural, and I found myself bouncing around like a ping pong ball trying to
make heads or tails of it.
* There is auth buried deep inside the kv.Task implementation that kept throwing me
off b/c it kept throwing errors, instead of warns. I assume, not sure if I'm
correct on this, but that the stuff being logged is determined inconsequential
to the task working. I had lots of errors from the auth buried in there, and hadn't
a clue what to make of it....
leaving these notes here as a look back at why working with tasks is so
difficult. This API can improve dramatically. I spent 5x the time trying
to figure out how to use the task API, in procedural calls, than I did
writing the business logic to consume it.... that's a scary realization ;-(
references: #17434
Timmy Luong
Sam Arnold
Daniel Moran
dubsky
Greg
greg linton
Deniz Kusefoglu
Johnny Steenbergen
rbose22
David McKay