There is a lot of confusion in the code if the range is [start, end) or
[start, end]. This is not made easier because it is acts one way in some
areas and in another way in some other areas, but it is usually [start,
end]. The `time = ?` syntax assumed that it was [start, end) and added
an extra nanosecond to the end time to accomodate for that, but the
range was actually [start, end] and that caused it to include one extra
nanosecond when it shouldn't have.
This change fixes it so exactly one timestamp is selected when `time = ?`
is used.
Jonathan A. Sternberg
Ben Johnson
Jason Wilder