fix(v1): remove incorrect FUTURE/PAST LIMIT ordering caution from OSS spec
The caution stated that prior to v1.12.3, PAST LIMIT must appear before FUTURE LIMIT. This is incorrect — the correct syntax has always been FUTURE LIMIT before PAST LIMIT. The v1.12.3 fix addresses Enterprise meta-node recording of limits, not parser syntax order.pull/6945/head
parent
3f6b969e81
commit
63fcdb7e4d
|
|
@ -389,12 +389,6 @@ create_database_stmt = "CREATE DATABASE" db_name
|
|||
> [!Note]
|
||||
> When using both `FUTURE LIMIT` and `PAST LIMIT` clauses, `FUTURE LIMIT` must appear before `PAST LIMIT`.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!Caution]
|
||||
> **Prior to InfluxDB v1.12.3**, when using both `FUTURE LIMIT` and `PAST LIMIT` clauses,
|
||||
> `PAST LIMIT` must appear before `FUTURE LIMIT`.
|
||||
> [Upgrade to InfluxDB v1.12.3 or later](/influxdb/v1/about_the_project/release-notes/#v1123)
|
||||
> to use the order shown above.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!Warning]
|
||||
> Replication factors do not serve a purpose with single node instances.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -432,12 +426,6 @@ create_retention_policy_stmt = "CREATE RETENTION POLICY" policy_name on_clause
|
|||
> [!Note]
|
||||
> When using both `FUTURE LIMIT` and `PAST LIMIT` clauses, `FUTURE LIMIT` must appear before `PAST LIMIT`.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!Caution]
|
||||
> **Prior to InfluxDB v1.12.3**, when using both `FUTURE LIMIT` and `PAST LIMIT` clauses,
|
||||
> `PAST LIMIT` must appear before `FUTURE LIMIT`.
|
||||
> [Upgrade to InfluxDB v1.12.3 or later](/influxdb/v1/about_the_project/release-notes/#v1123)
|
||||
> to use the order shown above.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!Warning]
|
||||
> Replication factors do not serve a purpose with single node instances.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue