* Make sensor and binary_sensor inherit from base class
* Drop several pointless public properties
* Make sure base function has same parameters
* Drop pass
* Missed one
* Adjust inherit order
* Passes secure parameter when setting up Nuki (#36844)
* Adds an additional configuration option for soft bridges instead of passing True when setting up the bridge
* Revert "Adds an additional configuration option for soft bridges instead of passing True when setting up the bridge"
This reverts commit af1d839ab1.
* Add event attribute to display last received event
* Restore state using event attribute
* Allow empty dict for device config
* Must also validate normal case
* Do early return
* Refactor cached ZHA channel reads.
If doing a cached ZCL attribute read, do "only_from_cache" read for
battery operated devices only. Mains operated devices will do a network
read in case of a cache miss.
* Use cached attributes for ZHA electrical measurement
* Bump up ZHA zigpy dependency.
* Remove support for legacy logbook events created before 0.112
Reduce the complexity of the logbook code. This
should also have a small performance boost.
* None is the default
Most of the the template platforms would check for
extract_entities failing to extract entities and avoid
setting up a state change listner for MATCH_ALL after
extract_entities had warned that it could not extract
the entities and updates would need to be done manually.
This protection has been extended to all template platforms.
Alter the behavior of extract_entities to return the
successfully extracted entities if one or more templates
fail extraction instead of returning MATCH_ALL
async_track_state_change_event is faster than async_track_state_change
and since we do not care about the data being returned to the callback
this is a simple speedup
async_track_state_change_event is faster than async_track_state_change
and since we do not care about the data being returned to the callback
this is a simple speedup
* Switch async_track_state_change to the faster async_track_state_change_event part 4
Calling async_track_state_change_event directly is faster than async_track_state_change (see #37251) since async_track_state_change is a wrapper around async_track_state_change_event now
* pylint
Calling async_track_state_change_event directly is faster than async_track_state_change (see #37251) since async_track_state_change is a wrapper around async_track_state_change_event now
Calling async_track_state_change_event directly is faster than async_track_state_change (see #37251) since async_track_state_change is a wrapper around async_track_state_change_event now
Joakim Plate
J. Nick Koston
Xiaonan Shen
Shulyaka
jjlawren
HomeAssistant Azure
Ivan Belokobylskiy
Martin Weinelt
Daniel Shokouhi
rajlaud
Abílio Costa
Marcel van der Veldt
Tim Messerschmidt
Eugene Prystupa
Chris
Perry Naseck
Anders Melchiorsen
cgtobi
Alexei Chetroi
Bram Kragten
mdegat01
Sly Gryphon
Pascal Vizeli
Erik Montnemery
shker
Paulus Schoutsen