* Always do thread safety check when writing state
Refactor the 3 most common places where the thread safety check
for the event loop to be inline to make the check fast enough
that we can keep it long term. While code review catches most
of the thread safety issues in core, some of them still make
it through, and new ones keep getting added. Its not possible
to catch them all with manual code review, so its worth the
tiny overhead to check each time.
Previously the check was limited to custom components
because they were the most common source of thread
safety issues.
* Always do thread safety check when writing state
Refactor the 3 most common places where the thread safety check
for the event loop to be inline to make the check fast enough
that we can keep it long term. While code review catches most
of the thread safety issues in core, some of them still make
it through, and new ones keep getting added. Its not possible
to catch them all with manual code review, so its worth the
tiny overhead to check each time.
Previously the check was limited to custom components
because they were the most common source of thread
safety issues.
* async_fire is more common than expected with ccs
* fix mock
* fix hass mocking
* Add thread safety checks to async_create_task
Calling async_create_task from a thread almost always results in an
fast crash. Since most internals are using async_create_background_task
or other task APIs, and this is the one integrations seem to get wrong
the most, add a thread safety check here
* Add thread safety checks to async_create_task
Calling async_create_task from a thread almost always results in an
fast crash. Since most internals are using async_create_background_task
or other task APIs, and this is the one integrations seem to get wrong
the most, add a thread safety check here
* missed one
* Update homeassistant/core.py
* fix mocks
* one more internal
* more places where internal can be used
* more places where internal can be used
* more places where internal can be used
* internal one more place since this is high volume and was already eager_start
* DNM: Make run_immediately the default for listeners
This is a test to see how much progress we have made twords this goal
https://github.com/home-assistant/core/pull/113727#issuecomment-2004587947
* fix shutdown
* Revert "fix shutdown"
This reverts commit a8969d7db9.
* set false since it break utility meter tests
* one more
* fix rfxtrx test
* test needs to be explict now
* fix matrix
* fail sooner
Co-authored-by: Sid <27780930+autinerd@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marc Mueller <30130371+cdce8p@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <nick@koston.org>
* Add generic entity platform setup fixture
* rename fixture
* No need for passing hass
* Make function instead of fixture
* Improve typing
* Use Sequence instead
* Migrate flux to use the new helper
* Use list instead
* Use Sequence instead
* Add category registry
* Add entity registry support
* Update homeassistant/components/config/entity_registry.py
Co-authored-by: Martin Hjelmare <marhje52@gmail.com>
* Use ulid instead
* Add tests for adding same name in different scopes
* Handle keyerror on update
* Lookup tweak
* Omit categories from entity registry snapshots
* Use base registry
* Update snapshots
* Update snapshots
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Hjelmare <marhje52@gmail.com>
Construct storage data in the executor
Constructing storage data can be expensive for large files and can block the event
loop. While ideally we optimize the construction of the data, there are some places
we cannot make it any faster. To avoid blocking the loop, the construction of
the data is now done in the executor by running the data_func in the executor.
2024-03-14 11:28:20.178 WARNING (MainThread) [asyncio] Executing <TimerHandle cancelled when=2319925.760294916 Store._async_schedule_callback_delayed_write() created at /Users/bdraco/home-assistant/homeassistant/helpers/storage.py:328> took 0.159 seconds
There is some risk that the data_func is not thread-safe and needs to be run in
the event loop, but I could not find any cases in our existing code where it
would be a problem