Fix the supported architectures section

1_00_stable_10817
Eric Andersen 2004-10-08 10:52:08 +00:00
parent 6c4a6b1a23
commit fdfa09b5c7
1 changed files with 8 additions and 7 deletions

15
README
View File

@ -31,16 +31,17 @@ If you wish to install hard links, rather than symlinks, you can use
Supported architectures: Supported architectures:
BusyBox in general will build on any architecture supported by gcc. It has BusyBox in general will build on any architecture supported by gcc.
a few specialized features added for __sparc__ and __alpha__. insmod Kernel module loading for 2.2 and 2.4 Linux kernels is currently
functionality is currently limited to ARM, CRIS, H8/300, x86, ia64, limited to ARM, CRIS, H8/300, x86, ia64, x86_64, m68k, MIPS, PowerPC,
x86_64, m68k, MIPS, PowerPC, S390, SH3/4/5, Sparc, v850e, and x86_64 S390, SH3/4/5, Sparc, v850e, and x86_64 for 2.4.x kernels. For 2.6.x
for 2.4.x kernels. For 2.6.x kernels kernels, kernel module loading support should work on all architectures.
Supported C Libraries: Supported C Libraries:
uClibc and glibc are supported. People have been looking at newlib and uClibc and glibc are supported. People have been looking at newlib and
diet-libc, but they are currently considered unsupported, untested, or dietlibc, but they are currently considered unsupported, untested, or
worse. Linux-libc5 is no longer supported -- you should probably use uClibc worse. Linux-libc5 is no longer supported -- you should probably use uClibc
instead if you want a small C library. instead if you want a small C library.
@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ an example:
With GNU date I get the following output: With GNU date I get the following output:
$ date $ date
Sat Mar 27 14:19:41 MST 2004 Fri Oct 8 14:19:41 MDT 2004
But when I use BusyBox date I get this instead: But when I use BusyBox date I get this instead: