targets/targets.json already added MCU_LPC11U35_501 as an extra label
but it didn't have LPC11U35_501 (without the MCU_ prefix). Both of
these target names are used as folder names to organize files
specific to this device. For example the LPC11U35.ld linker script used
by GCC_ARM for this target is located in a TARGET_LPC11U35_501 folder.
I switched to using inheritance to properly setup the target labels
based on @theotherjimmy comments on PR #4252. Everything in the
XADOW_M0 targe appears to have been copy/pasted from LPC11U35_501
anyway so inheritance seems to be the best way to set the values of
the XADOW_M0 properties.
NXP LPC176x/5x User Manual UM10360 Rev 4.1:
32.3.2.8 RAM used by IAP command handler
Flash programming commands use the top 32 bytes of on-chip RAM. The maximum stack
usage in the user allocated stack space is 128 bytes and it grows downwards.
NXP LPC176x/5x User Manual UM10360 Rev 4.1:
32.3.2.8 RAM used by IAP command handler
Flash programming commands use the top 32 bytes of on-chip RAM. The maximum stack
usage in the user allocated stack space is 128 bytes and it grows downwards.
NXP LPC176x/5x User Manual UM10360 Rev 4.1:
32.3.2.8 RAM used by IAP command handler
Flash programming commands use the top 32 bytes of on-chip RAM. The maximum stack
usage in the user allocated stack space is 128 bytes and it grows downwards.
NXP LPC176x/5x User Manual UM10360 Rev 4.1:
32.3.2.8 RAM used by IAP command handler
Flash programming commands use the top 32 bytes of on-chip RAM. The maximum stack
usage in the user allocated stack space is 128 bytes and it grows downwards.
NXP LPC176x/5x User Manual UM10360 Rev 4.1:
32.3.2.8 RAM used by IAP command handler
Flash programming commands use the top 32 bytes of on-chip RAM. The maximum stack
usage in the user allocated stack space is 128 bytes and it grows downwards.
NXP LPC176x/5x User Manual UM10360 Rev 4.1:
32.3.2.8 RAM used by IAP command handler
Flash programming commands use the top 32 bytes of on-chip RAM. The maximum stack
usage in the user allocated stack space is 128 bytes and it grows downwards.
When attempting to perform a test build of various mbed-os targets with
GCC configured to build -std=gnu++11, all of the targets built
successfully except for this one. It gave errors like this:
../mbed-os/targets/TARGET_STM/TARGET_STM32F4/TARGET_UBLOX_EVK_ODIN_W2/sdk/wifi_emac/wifi_emac_api.cpp: In function 'emac_interface_t* wifi_emac_get_interface()':
../mbed-os/targets/TARGET_STM/TARGET_STM32F4/TARGET_UBLOX_EVK_ODIN_W2/sdk/wifi_emac/wifi_emac_api.cpp:331:38: error: use of deleted function 'emac_interface::emac_interface()'
_intf = new emac_interface_t();
^
In file included from ../mbed-os/targets/TARGET_STM/TARGET_STM32F4/TARGET_UBLOX_EVK_ODIN_W2/sdk/wifi_emac/wifi_emac_api.cpp:9:0:
../mbed-os/hal/emac_api.h:150:16: note: 'emac_interface::emac_interface()' is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed:
typedef struct emac_interface {
^
../mbed-os/hal/emac_api.h:150:16: error: uninitialized const member in 'struct emac_interface'
../mbed-os/hal/emac_api.h:151:32: note: 'const emac_interface_ops_t emac_interface::ops' should be initialized
const emac_interface_ops_t ops;
This commit contains a proposed change which fixes this issue by not
using the new operator to allocate the emac_interface_t structure but
instead using the malloc() function since the construction is being
handled explicitly in the subsequent lines of the
wifi_emac_get_interface() function anyway.
I also added code which only completes the initialization of the _intf
object if its allocation succeeds and just returns NULL otherwise.
I see no deallocation of the _intf object occurring so no change from
delete to free() needed to be made.
Revert HRM1017 file source deletion
Added in small comment next to additions
Added mapping to BTN-labelled switches
Added mapping to USER_BUTTON-labelled switches
Undo incorrect mapping to SWIO pin in NORDIC target
Before this patch, many warnings like below were generated
during compilation with ArmCC
[Warning] lwip_ethernet.h@57,0: #3135-D: attribute does not apply to any entity
This happens here as ``--gnu`` option of ArmCC is being used, which
enables the GNU compiler extensions that the ARM compiler supports.
This is solve by adding a extra check on __CCARM .
This patch enable the LWIP feature for the LPC4088 and LPC4088_DM boards.
The lwIP stack support already this hardware.
See: ./features/FEATURE_LWIP/lwip-interface/lwip-eth/arch/TARGET_NXP/lpc17_emac.c
Anna Bridge
Jimmy Brisson
Kevin Gilbert
Adam Green
0x6d61726b
Laurent MEUNIER
Chris
Indrek Ardel
Rob Meades
Sam Grove
Daniel Zimmermann
Mahadevan Mahesh
maclobdell
Andrzej Puzdrowski
jeromecoutant