From 91d0a6dec0cc1a53d3d0c49ccc765f751452f63d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: anish-k <anish-k@hcl.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:43:18 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] InterruptIn : STM32: Implemented error catching for multiple
 gpio irq line

The multiple InterruptIn object with same pin_index sharing same IRQ line.
So the second object will overwrite the first one. To catch this as error,
implemented an error catching functionality.
---
 targets/TARGET_STM/gpio_irq_api.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/targets/TARGET_STM/gpio_irq_api.c b/targets/TARGET_STM/gpio_irq_api.c
index e44373dc0d..0d5167c565 100644
--- a/targets/TARGET_STM/gpio_irq_api.c
+++ b/targets/TARGET_STM/gpio_irq_api.c
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ typedef struct gpio_channel {
 } gpio_channel_t;
 
 static gpio_irq_handler irq_handler;
+static uint16_t irq_channel_used = 0x00;
 
 static gpio_channel_t channels[CHANNEL_NUM] = {
 #ifdef EXTI_IRQ0_NUM_LINES
@@ -331,6 +332,14 @@ int gpio_irq_init(gpio_irq_t *obj, PinName pin, gpio_irq_handler handler, uint32
     uint32_t pin_index  = STM_PIN(pin);
     irq_index =  pin_lines_desc[pin_index].irq_index;
 
+    if (irq_channel_used & (1<<pin_index)) {
+        error("InterruptIn error: irq channel conflict\n");
+        return -1;
+    }
+    else {
+        irq_channel_used |= (1<<pin_index);
+    }
+
     switch (irq_index) {
 #ifdef EXTI_IRQ0_NUM_LINES
         case 0:
@@ -457,6 +466,8 @@ void gpio_irq_free(gpio_irq_t *obj)
     gpio_channel->channel_gpio[gpio_idx] = 0;
     gpio_channel->channel_pin[gpio_idx] = 0;
 
+    irq_channel_used &= ~(1<<(STM_PIN(obj->pin)));
+
     core_util_critical_section_exit();
 }